IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v3y2024ip71id71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of nutritional support in critically ill patients. An interdisciplinary view

Author

Listed:
  • Ponti
  • Pascualini

Abstract

Introduction: as part of an interdisciplinary project, the actions taken by different healthcare professionals (doctors and nurses) over the quality of critical patients’ nutritional support were addressed at a private institution. Objective: to determine the impact of the prescribed nutritional intake and the records of medical and nursing professionals on the quality of nutritional support; anthropometric, biochemical, clinical indicators, and medical and nursing records were identified. Methods: an explanatory, cross-sectional, observational / non-experimental, retrospective, qualitative and quantitative research study with n = 34. An observation tool created ad hoc was used for approaching the clinical charts of patients with variables in sociodemographic data, nutritional screening, medical and nursing records, and quality in nutritional support. Results: the results have shown a high level of “no record” fields within both types of healthcare professionals. It is hence inferred that there were no regulations regarding the restoration and enhancement of the nutritional status at the institution under study. Additionally, it is deduced that each professional goes through a documentation process which frames and makes visible the relationship to the records of the medical and nursing professionals. The absence of regulations was rated as a latent variable (non-observable). Conclusions: the impact on the quality of the prescribed nutritional intake and their relationship to the records of medical and nursing professionals could be determined. The absence of regulations was rated as a latent variable (non-observable)

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:71:id:71
DOI: 10.56294/hl202471
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:71:id:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.