IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v3y2024ip.495id.495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teacher Evaluation In Postgraduate Studies: Reflections And Current Projections

Author

Listed:
  • Lalama Flores
  • Castro Sánchez
  • Lalama Gavilánez
  • Robalino Cáceres

Abstract

The teaching and learning process in postgraduate programs requires that instructors respond to multiple social and individual demands, which lead to the necessity of having up-to-date knowledge in their field of expertise, in teaching methodologies, in technological aspects, in teacher-student relationships, and in different learning approaches, among others. This ensures that postgraduate students maintain an active performance. Therefore, this study aims to present the results of an evaluation of the performance of postgraduate instructors. To this end, qualitative and quantitative methods are used, drawing from various sources of information such as student evaluations of instructors, self-assessments, evaluations by the academic coordinator, and the Postgraduate Directorate. In this context, the applied tool allows for the determination of the weighting of instructor performance in qualitative and quantitative terms, based on the "Generic Model for Evaluating the Learning Environment of Postgraduate Programs." Key points highlighted in the conclusions include the high quality of instructors in their respective fields of expertise, which is notably different from the negative perceptions students have regarding the academic aspects of the faculty. It is concluded that analyzing spaces for reflection within postgraduate classrooms is predominantly related to instructors, and these reflective spaces allow for optimization with high levels of academic rigor in the teaching and learning processes

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.495:id:.495
DOI: 10.56294/hl2024.495
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.495:id:.495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.