IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v3y2024ip.402id.402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Dynamics of Interprofessional Collaboration and Attitudes in Health Science Librarianship

Author

Listed:
  • Tanvi
  • Behera
  • Setia
  • Parmar
  • Prakash Chandra
  • Kumbhar

Abstract

The Interdiscipline Education Perception Scale (IEPS) was used in this research to gauge health science librarians' views toward interprofessional cooperation and to learn more about their participation in such activities. The IEPS and questions regarding respondents' past and recent experience with IPE were addressed to librarians in the interprofessional education special interest group (IPE-SIG) and research section (RS) of the medical library association (MLA). To evaluate attitudes, the research compared the mean IEPS scores of each MLA group with several other demographic variables. The IEPS results for health science librarians showed favourable sentiments regarding IPE. There is no group differences were significantly varies from the others. The mean IEPS score of health science librarians was comparable to the mean score of health profession students commencing previous research. Fewer people worked on group or participated in extracurricular activities like reading clubs and grand rounds; the majority often reported interprofessional engagement was instructing or facilitating learning behaviour for students in the health profession. Health science librarians in this research had favourable sentiments regarding IPE, which is consistent with the common among other health professionals and subsequently the subject of research. The replies to the poll were not significantly influenced by the existence of an experience, prior professions as a health expert, or past work supporting IPE as a librarian. This implies that health science librarians are supportive of IPE, whether or not librarian actively promote IPE initiatives or engage in interprofessional activities

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.402:id:.402
DOI: 10.56294/hl2024.402
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.402:id:.402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.