IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v2y2023ip315id315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in the Utilization of Quality of Life Assessment Instruments in Clinical Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Mohanty
  • Ingale
  • Mani
  • Sharma

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) evaluations are now an important part of clinical practice because they give doctors important information about how well their patients are doing. With more and more focus on patient-centered care, it is important to look at how QoL measurement tools are being used in different professional situations. The point of this study is to look into how quality of life (QoL) tools are used in regular clinical practice and how they affect decisions about healthcare. Method: all peer-reviewed studies released in the last 20 years that looked at measuring quality of life in healthcare settings were found through a thorough literature review. We looked through databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for applicable papers. We focused on the types of tools used, how often they were used, and the patient groups that were evaluated. It was thought about to use both qualitative and quantitative study methods. Results: the study shows that QoL rating tools are being used more and more in many medical fields, especially in cancer, heart, and psychiatry. A lot of people have used instruments like the EQ-5D, SF-36, and WHOQOL-BREF. Integration with electronic health records (EHR) systems is also becoming more widespread. This lets data be collected and analysed in real time. Conclusion: Quality of life (QoL) measurement tools are very important for improving patient care because they help doctors decide how to treat patients and make sure they get better results. As healthcare moves towards a more patient-centered approach, these tools will likely be used more.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:315:id:315
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023315
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:315:id:315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.