IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v2y2023ip302id302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Environmental Health Factors on Rates of Hospital Readmission

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma
  • Samuel Jayakumar
  • Pawar
  • Prakash Chandra
  • Ranjan Jena

Abstract

Introduction: readmissions to the hospital are a key indicator of both the quality of care and how much it costs. However, external health factors that affect return rates have not been studied much. This study tries to fill in that gap by looking at how certain surrounding factors affect how often people have to go back to the hospital. Method: a retrospective cohort study was done using data from 10,000 hospital patients over five years. Environmental data, such as air quality, water quality, and population density, were combined with hospital discharge records. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to account for factors that could affect the results, such as age, gender, illnesses, and the reason for the first hospitalisation. Findings: the results show a strong link between bad air quality and more people having to go back to the hospital (OR=1,45, 95 % CI 1,22-1,73). In the same way, lower water quality was linked to a higher chance of being readmitted, especially for heart and lung diseases. Different health results were not always affected by the amount of people living in cities. Conclusion: environmental health issues, especially the quality of the air and water, have a big impact on the number of times people have to go back to the hospital. These findings show how important it is for healthcare policies to include environmental health knowledge and measures to lower avoidable readmissions. This will improve patient results and lower the cost of running healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:302:id:302
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023302
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:302:id:302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.