IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v2y2023ip299id299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback Systems in Occupational Health

Author

Listed:
  • Lochan Behera
  • Patil
  • S
  • Bhavani

Abstract

Introduction: As occupational health changes, real-time feedback systems (RTFS) are becoming more and more seen as important tools for improving safety at work and the health and happiness of employees. This study looks into how well RTFS works for tracking and improving health results at work. Methods: We used a mixed-techniques approach, combining numeric data from machine usage logs with private feedback from person polls in some of distinct agencies. a group of 300 people from extraordinary backgrounds took component within the examine and had been given distinctive RTFS for 6 months. The link among gadget feedback and higher fitness and safety behaviour changed into looked at the use of statistical analysis. Findings: The results show that RTFS made workplace health management a lot better. Quantitative data showed that accidents at work went down by 40% and environmental compliance went up by 25%. Qualitative data showed that 85% of the people who took part found the comments helpful for making their work habits and safety knowledge better. Conclusion: The study shows that RTFS has the ability to make workplaces better and healthier. RTFS not only lowers risks but also gives workers the power to take charge of their own health and safety by giving them instant insights and tips they can use. Putting these kinds of tools together could completely change how workplace health is managed, so more research and use of them in many different areas is needed.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:299:id:299
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023299
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:299:id:299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.