Author
Listed:
- Sharma
- Sekhar Patra
- Sujayaraj
- Devkar
Abstract
Using artificial intelligence (AI) in the healthcare sector alters doctors' major decision-making process. Evaluating patients' quality of life (QoL) is one area where artificial intelligence seems rather promising. Understanding how various illnesses and therapies influence a person's overall health depends much on quality of life testing. Standard QoL exams, which rely on hand-written assessments and patient comments on their health, have issues like being subjective, biassed, and sluggish when it comes to analyse vast volumes of data. AI-powered testing tools can provide more accurate, quick, scalable methods to evaluate QoL if one is looking for a way around these challenges. This essay examines how artificial intelligence technology could alter the methodology of quality of life surveys. Diagnostics based on artificial intelligence are quite useful. For patient anecdotes, for instance, natural language processing (NLP) may be employed; machine learning techniques can then be used to project QoL values from medical data. AI systems can handle a lot of clinical data including medical records, imaging data, patient-reported results to generate objective, real-time, tailored QoL evaluations consistent and reusable once and again. Furthermore, these instruments can identify early warning indicators of deterioration that would not be evident using more conventional approaches. the usage of several sorts of records sources inclusive of clever tech and cellular fitness apps which increases the accuracy of stories in real time and allows non-stop tracking AI-driven checking out will also be led via This method not handiest courses medical doctors in making better selections however additionally affords people extra manipulate over their fitness, therefore improving their excellent of life over time. The studies additionally addresses moral questions arising from AI-primarily based QoL assessments consisting of data protection, patient permission, and what clinical professionals should do upon assessment of AI outcomes. through discussion of these issues, this take a look at emphasises the need of ensuring that synthetic intelligence generation be applied in a way that complements the interaction among the affected person and company in preference to replaces human know-how.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:237:id:237
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023237
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:237:id:237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.