IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v2y2023ip219id219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Impact of Healthcare Educational Initiatives on the Quality of Professional Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Tomar
  • Senapati
  • Borah
  • T. C
  • Karpe

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to find out if healthcare training programs can improve the level of professional work among healthcare providers. As the need for better patient care and ongoing professional development grows, educational approaches are becoming more and more seen as essential ways to give doctors more advanced knowledge and skills. Methods: Both numeric and qualitative data were used in a mixed-methods technique. We looked at 30 peer-reviewed studies that came out between 2015 and 2023 and did a meta-analysis of results linked to clinical performance and the level of patient care. Also, 50 healthcare workers who took part in these training events were interviewed in a semi-structured way. Results: The results of the meta-analysis showed that clinical skills and patient outcomes got better, and the effect size was modest (Cohen's d = 0.5). Qualitative results showed that subjects said the main benefits were more trust and more up-to-date information. When digital tools were used in training, people were more interested and remembered more of what they learnt. Conclusions: Healthcare training programs are very important for improving the standard of clinical practice. The results show that these kinds of programs should continue to get money, with a focus on using digital tools to improve learning and effects. More study needs to be done on how these teaching tools work over time and whether they can be used in a wide range of hospital situations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:219:id:219
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023219
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:219:id:219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.