IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v2y2023ip189id189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric study of scientific production in Scopus on psychiatric nutrition

Author

Listed:
  • Cárdenas Hernández
  • Araujo Inastrilla
  • Muhiña Díaz

Abstract

Introduction: Nutrition is a crucial aspect in psychiatry, as a proper diet can decrease the impact and disability associated with mental disorders. Therefore, it is necessary to know the current state of available information for the scientific community on this topic. Objective: To characterize the scientific production indexed in Scopus on psychiatric nutrition from 2019 to 2022. Method: A bibliometric study was conducted on scientific production related to psychiatric nutrition indexed in Scopus from 2019 to 2022. Bibliometric indicators of productivity, impact, and collaboration were studied. The data were exported from the bibliographic database in question and processed with the support of VOSviewer and Microsoft Excel tools. Results: Between 2019 and 2022, the scientific production on psychiatric nutrition available in Scopus covered a total of 198 publications. The year with the highest production was 2021 with 29.8% of the published documents in the studied period. Citations of publications tended to decrease. A chronological analysis of the co-occurrence of the term "nutrition" in detail allowed us to observe a higher frequency of this term in publications in 2020. Regarding collaboration between countries, the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia stood out. Conclusions: Scientific production on psychiatric nutrition has grown moderately from 2019 to 2022, although its impact has remained in decline. It is important to strengthen the production of knowledge about this topic and promote interdisciplinary collaboration between psychiatry, psychology, and nutrition

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:189:id:189
DOI: 10.56294/hl2023189
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:2:y:2023:i::p:189:id:189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.