IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v1y2025ip96id96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of the use of antihypertensives and their relationship with sars-cov-2

Author

Listed:
  • Castro Mindiola
  • Soledispa Cañarte

Abstract

This comparative study analyzed the published scientific evidence about the association between the reduction of severity or mortality due to COVID-19, and the efficiency of the use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (BRAs) compared to other drugs antihypertensives non-ACEI/ARB in hypertensive patients. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of the risk of morbidity, severity or mortality due severe acute respiratory failure in hypertensive patients and the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and inhibitor drugs non-peptic Angio II receptor antagonists (ARBs II) in SARS-Cov-2. The methodology used was the exhaustive bibliographic review of literary bases through the advanced search function of observational studies, clinical trials and meta-analyses that focus on the use of ACE Inhibitors/BRAs in SARS-Cov-2. The ACEI and ARB results demonstrated better efficacy in terms of control of inflammatory processes and low risk of severity due to COVID-19 than CCBs. In addition, several studies affirm that there is a low risk of hospitalization, intubation and mortality from all cardiovascular causes during COVID-19 disease. Therefore, published scientific evidence suggests acceptable safety of the management of ACEIs / ARBs in SARS-Cov-2 and arterial hypertension in contrast to the few studies where ACEIs / ARBs increased the susceptibility of SARS-Cov-2, resulting in potential systemic damage. Conclusion: The medium-low quality of scientific evidence suggests an urgent need for a new systematic review that includes a greater number of randomized clinical trials, to corroborate the magnitude of the risk of morbidity, severity, and mortality from SARS-Cov-2.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:1:y:2025:i::p:96:id:96
DOI: 10.56294/hl202296
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:1:y:2025:i::p:96:id:96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.