IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v1y2022ip121id121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Performance Indicators and Their Influence on Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Biswal
  • Awasthi
  • Sharma

Abstract

Organizational performance indicators (OPIs) are key measurements used to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, and overall success of healthcare (Hc) organizations. These indicators can potentially influence Patient Satisfaction (PS), an important factor in determining healthcare quality. Understanding the link between OPIs and patient satisfaction might help healthcare practitioners improve service delivery. Hence, to evaluate the impact of several OPI on PS in healthcare settings, this research involves a mixed-methods approach. This approach included quantitative analysis through surveys of OPIs and PS, as well as qualitative interviews with healthcare personnel. OPIs such as Personnel Efficiency (PE), Resource Management (RM), Patient Care Quality (PCQ), Patient satisfaction (PS), and Healthcare Service Time (HcST) were assessed. Data were obtained from various healthcare settings, and using SPSS statistical approaches like descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression, the relationship between OPIs and PS was analysed. Research found a substantial positive relationship between specific OPIs and greater levels of PS. The results indicated that Resource Management (RM) had the highest performance, while Personnel Efficiency (PE) showed the lowest, emphasizing key areas for improving patient satisfaction. The analysis identified areas where OPIs may be enhanced to improve patient experiences, such as communication and personalized treatment.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:1:y:2022:i::p:121:id:121
DOI: 10.56294/hl2022121
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:1:y:2022:i::p:121:id:121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.