IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/evitro/2023v2a19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of adhesive strength in bracket cementation

Author

Listed:
  • Darwin Newton Yanac Calero
  • Ann Rosemary Chanamé Marín

Abstract

The cementation of metal brackets was an essential aspect of successful orthodontic treatment, as the adhesive strength against shear forces determined their stability during treatment. Various national and international studies analysed the effectiveness of different cements, such as orthodontic resins and glass ionomers, showing variations in the adhesive strength achieved. Research such as that conducted by Chumacero, Huaita and Aguilar showed that, although some cements offered higher resistance values, the differences were not always statistically significant. Furthermore, multiple factors were identified that influenced adhesion, such as the type of bracket base, enamel preparation, the pressure exerted during cementation, and the patient's clinical condition. Likewise, the need to achieve adhesion that is strong enough to maintain the brackets during treatment, but also safe enough to allow removal without damaging the enamel, was highlighted. Studies such as those by García and Herrera emphasised the importance of the bracket base and the type of resin used, while Fraga and Spaccesi evaluated the effects of pre-conditioning and concluded that there were no significant differences between techniques or concentrations applied. Overall, the evidence supported the importance of selecting an adhesive system that is balanced in strength, safety and practicality, highlighting the need for further standardised research to improve clinical efficacy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:evitro:2023v2a19
DOI: 10.56294/evk202246
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:evitro:2023v2a19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://evk.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.