IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/ethaic/v1y2022ip20id20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Algorithmic biases in mental health diagnoses and their impact on vulnerable populations: a documentary review of advances and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Ariadna Matos Matos

Abstract

Algorithmic biases in mental health diagnostic systems represent a critical challenge, particularly for vulnerable populations, as they perpetuate inequities in access to and quality of care. This article aims to analyze advances and challenges in identifying and mitigating these biases through a documentary review of Spanish and English articles indexed in Scopus between 2018 and 2022. The methodology involved a systematic analysis of 50 selected studies, classified into four thematic areas: types of algorithmic biases, clinical impact on vulnerable populations, technical limitations in algorithm development, and proposed mitigation strategies. The results demonstrate that biases are deeply rooted in training data and the unequal representation of marginalized groups, leading to less accurate diagnoses for women, racialized communities, and low-income individuals. Although technical and ethical approaches have been proposed, gaps persist in their practical implementation. The study concludes that without multidisciplinary intervention integrating public health, ethics, and data science perspectives, algorithms will continue to reproduce structural inequalities. This research underscores the urgency of inclusive policies and robust regulatory frameworks to ensure equity in digital mental health.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:ethaic:v:1:y:2022:i::p:20:id:20
DOI: 10.56294/ai202220
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:ethaic:v:1:y:2022:i::p:20:id:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ai.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.