IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip759id1056294dm2025759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Comparison of Controllers for a Robotic Transfemoral Prosthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Mosquera
  • Vladimir Bonilla
  • Sofía Vergara
  • Christian Rueda
  • Marcelo Moya

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of four control strategies—Proportional-Derivative (PD), Feedforward-Feedback PD (FF-FB PD), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), and Feedforward-Feedback LQR (FF-FB LQR)—implemented on a robotic transfemoral prosthesis. The performance metrics, including overshoot, settling time, trajectory tracking accuracy, and torque requirements, were evaluated using simulation models. The results indicate that the FF-FB LQR controller demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest overshoot (4.98%) and near-zero trajectory tracking error. All controllers required approximately 8.6 Nm of torque, suggesting consistent energy requirements across strategies despite their performance differences. The LQR controller exhibited the best stability, minimizing overshoot and improving overall system response. These findings highlight the advantages of feedforward-feedback control strategies, particularly the FF-FB LQR, for controlling robotic transfemoral prostheses with enhanced stability and accuracy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:759:id:1056294dm2025759
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025759
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:759:id:1056294dm2025759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.