IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip197id1056294dm2025197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning styles and academic performance in engineering students: A pre- and pos-pandemic bibliometric study

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Ramírez
  • Silvia Arciniega
  • Stefany Flores
  • José Jácome
  • Mateo Chancosi

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between learning styles and academic performance has gained significant attention, particularly in engineering education, as it plays an important role in enhancing the quality of the learning process. This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in this field, focusing on pre- and post-pandemic periods. Methods: A total of 1397 articles from the Scopus database were analyzed using VOSviewer software to map the scientific production until 2023. The analysis was divided into two periods: 2016-2019 and 2020-2023, identifying clústers of research focused on learning styles, academic performance, and the growing importance of e-learning post-pandemic. Results: Five main clústers were identified between 2016-2019, including learning styles, the development of evaluation instruments, psychological aspects, curricular development, and general learning. In the post-pandemic period, three dominant clústers emerged, focused on learning styles, academic performance, and e-learning. Co-authorship analysis revealed changes in collaboration patterns, with increased global cooperation, particularly in the United States, China, and Spain during the 2020-2023 period. Conclusions: The study highlights the increasing relevance of research on learning styles and the shift toward remote learning triggered by the pandemic. These findings underscore the need for further exploration of adaptive teaching strategies to diverse learning preferences in the evolving educational landscape.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:197:id:1056294dm2025197
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025197
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:197:id:1056294dm2025197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.