IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v2y2023ip90id1056294dm202390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between CAD-CAM and conventional techniques in the manufacture of fixed zirconia prostheses

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Victoria Manosalvas Tapia
  • Víctor Hugo Parreño Gallo
  • Noemi Estefani Morales Morales
  • Tatiana Lucrecia Pancho Chavarrea

Abstract

The use of CAD-CAM technology represents an advanced alternative to optimizing the production of fixed zirconia dental prostheses. This study focused on making a comparison between CAD-CAM techniques and conventional techniques for the production of these prostheses, evaluating various aspects. A methodology was used that combined a literature review based on high-impact academic databases and qualitative interviews with experts in the field. The findings revealed that both CAD-CAM and conventional techniques can achieve aesthetically satisfactory results in the manufacture of zirconia prostheses, depending on the experience and skill of the dental professional. No substantial differences were found to suggest that one technique alters the properties of zirconia significantly compared to the other. However, it was highlighted that CAD-CAM manufacturing systems offer advantages in terms of high quality and precision in fixed dental restorations. The choice between using one or another technology should be based on a detailed evaluation of the specific needs of the patient, considering the expertise of the dentist and the desired quality of the final result. This integrative approach ensures that the best technological option is considered based on the clinical context and patient expectations

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:90:id:1056294dm202390
DOI: 10.56294/dm202390
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:90:id:1056294dm202390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.