IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/pappsa/v1y2025ip133-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Social Security: The Distribution of Costs and Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhixiong
  • Liu, Huajie

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the burden and welfare distribution of China's social welfare framework and explore the economic impact and optimization plan of social security reform. Through a review of existing literature and a comparison of domestic and foreign experiences, combined with China's unique socio-economic background, the study adopts a combination of data analysis and case studies to focus on the financial challenges of the social security system in China, the contribution burden of enterprises and individuals, and the welfare access of different groups. The results show that the current social security system is facing great financial pressure, especially in terms of pension payments and social insurance coverage. There is an unbalanced contribution and benefit relationship, and some groups are not well protected. By comparing international experience, this study proposes reform directions for optimizing the social security system, including strategies such as reasonably adjusting social security tax rates, expanding security coverage, and improving the welfare level of low-income groups. The conclusion points out that social security reform should focus on the balance between fairness and sustainability and formulate policies that are in line with China's national conditions to ensure the long-term stable operation of the social security system and promote sustainable economic and social development.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dba:pappsa:v:1:y:2025:i::p:133-143
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/PAPPS/article/view/43/46
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:pappsa:v:1:y:2025:i::p:133-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/PAPPS .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.