Author
Listed:
- Albina A. Bilyalova
(Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University)
- Elena W. Dorofeeva
(Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University)
- Marina V. Kamasheva
(Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University)
Abstract
Background. The relevance of this research is driven by the growing influence of media in creating public consciousness, where linguistic devices such as epithets are not only literary devices but also tools in shaping the masses. An integrated approach to categorizing and functioning in the work of epithets in media texts facilitates the better comprehension of their work in building meaning, emotional associations, and manipulation. The article also takes into account translation strategies of preserving semantic, emotional, and pragmatic equivalence when translating English‑language mass media text epithets into Russian through strategies such as modulation, calquing, grammatical substitution, explication, and antonymic translation. Purpose — analysis of types of epithets and their functioning in English‑language media and identification of the peculiarities of their translation into Russian. Materials and methods. The study is based on material published in 2024–2025 in The Guardian, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Economist, and other publications, as well as their translations published on the InoSMI portal. Based on contextual, component, and comparative analysis, as well as statistical methods, the main types of English‑language epithets and translation techniques for their rendering into Russian have been identified. Results. It has been revealed that epithets not only perform emotional, evaluative, and expressive functions, but also become a tool for shaping media images and exerting semantic influence on the mass audience. Successful translation of epithets in media texts requires a strategy aimed at functional equivalence rather than formal correspondence. The translation of epithets in the media is a strategic operation to reconfigure the evaluative architecture of the text, which is necessary for adequate intercultural media dialogue.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:cxm:russhs:17:3:2025:124-142
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/3033-5981-2025-17-3-518
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxm:russhs:17:3:2025:124-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yan Maksimov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nkras.ru/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.