IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxi/jlls00/v3y2025i2id329.html

The Ethical Paradox of AI-Generated Texts: Investigating the Moral Responsibility in Generative Models

Author

Listed:
  • Parvaiz A. Ganai

    (Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts and Humanities, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia)

  • Irshad A. Naikoo

    (Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts and Humanities, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The rapid growth of large language models (LLMs) has transformed natural language processing, enabling the creation of text that is almost close to human writing. However, the increasing integration of AI-generated content has raised serious ethical challenges, particularly when we talk about the attribution of moral duty. The questions arise about accountability for misinformation, bias, and harmful outputs because LLMs operate without true agency or intent. This study critically examines the ethical paradox of AI-generated texts. It explores the roles and responsibilities of developers, users, and policymakers in mitigating risks associated with generative models. The study emphasizes the need for ethical frameworks that make fairness, transparency, and human oversight a priority. Furthermore, this research aims to contribute to current discussions on the moral and societal consequences of AI-generated language. The study offers a framework for responsible and ethically aligned AI development.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cxi:jlls00:v:3:y:2025:i:2:id:329
DOI: 10.61424/jlls.v3i2.329
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JLLS/article/view/329
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JLLS/article/download/329/260
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.61424/jlls.v3i2.329?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxi:jlls00:v:3:y:2025:i:2:id:329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JLLS .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.