IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxi/ijans0/v4y2026i3id1009.html

Bit Error Rate and Decoding Energy Consumption Analysis of Classical and Modern Error Control Codes for Wireless Sensor Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Chekwube Chukwunwendu Onyeonwu

    (Department of Electrical/ Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University)

  • Chimaihe Barnabas Mbachu

    (Department of Electrical/ Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University)

  • Chidiebere Nnaedozie Muoghalu

    (Department of Electrical/ Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University)

  • Chibuogwu Happy Ajieh

    (Department of Electrical/ Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University)

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) require reliable and energy-efficient communication because sensor nodes operate under limited energy resources and are frequently deployed in hostile environments where transmission errors are inevitable. Forward Error Correction (FEC) techniques improve communication reliability by correcting transmission errors without retransmission; however, different coding schemes exhibit varying trade-offs between error correction capability and decoding energy consumption. This study presents a comparative analysis of the Bit Error Rate (BER) and Decoding Energy per Bit (DEB) performances of four widely used error control codes, namely Bose–Chaudhuri–Hocquenghem (BCH), Reed–Solomon (RS), Convolutional, and Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes, for Wireless Sensor Networks. MATLAB simulations were conducted using identical communication conditions comprising Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation, an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel, and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Eb/No) values ranging from 1 to 9 dB. The LDPC scheme employed the Min-Sum decoding algorithm, while BCH, Reed–Solomon, and Convolutional codes employed their conventional decoding algorithms. The results showed that BER decreased with increasing Eb/No for all coding schemes, with LDPC consistently achieving the best error correction performance across the evaluated SNR range. In contrast, BCH recorded the lowest mean decoding energy consumption (0.400 nJ/bit), followed by Convolutional (0.440 nJ/bit), Reed–Solomon (0.480 nJ/bit), and LDPC (1.766 nJ/bit). The findings reveal a clear trade-off between communication reliability and decoding energy efficiency, demonstrating that although LDPC provides superior BER performance, it requires significantly higher decoding energy than the classical coding schemes. This study provides useful insights for selecting suitable error control codes based on the reliability and energy requirements of Wireless Sensor Network applications.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cxi:ijans0:v:4:y:2026:i:3:id:1009
DOI: 10.61424/ijans.v4i3.1009
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/IJANS/article/view/1009
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/IJANS/article/download/1009/802
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.61424/ijans.v4i3.1009?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxi:ijans0:v:4:y:2026:i:3:id:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/IJANS .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.