Author
Listed:
- Matías Ricardo Aranda Velez
(Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Licenciatura en Kinesiología y Fisiatría, Argentina)
- Horacio Russo
(Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Licenciatura en Kinesiología y Fisiatría, Argentina)
Abstract
Introduction: Neuropsychological and neurocognitive rehabilitation was presented as an evolving field aimed at improving functioning and quality of life in people with central nervous system disorders. Within this framework, cognitive stimulation was defined as a set of interventions aimed at enhancing processes such as attention, memory, language, and executive functions, and a transition was observed from restoration-centered approaches to compensatory strategies and a comprehensive view of the rehabilitation process. Development: Two predominant approaches in rehabilitation were described: the restoration of impaired functions and compensation through alternative strategies or external aids. Neurocognitive techniques were highlighted for their direct functional intervention on central mechanisms linked to the mental representation of movement, based on learning and neuroplasticity. In this context, motor imagery was characterized as the ability to mentally execute actions without muscle involvement, and its repetitive practice was associated with benefits in motor learning, performance, motivation, and functional recovery. Evidence supporting adaptive changes at the cortical, corticospinal, and spinal levels, along with reorganization of neural networks, was reviewed. In addition, the need for valid and reliable instruments to assess motor imagery was identified, considering the diversity of tests available depending on the focus on the first or second neuron. Conclusions: The study concluded that motor imagery was a therapeutic tool with significant potential in neurorehabilitation, whose clinical use required adequate evaluation and understanding of its neuroplastic foundations. It was considered that the systematic analysis of instruments and theoretical models favored more precise interventions and opened lines for future research.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:cwh:ijneur:v:57:y:2023:id:62
DOI: 10.62486/ijn202362
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwh:ijneur:v:57:y:2023:id:62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Andrew Alberto López Sánchez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijneurology.org/index.php/ijn .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.