IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwf/grarti/gr2026250.html

Medical students’ perceptions of anatomy teaching using technology and cadavers

Author

Listed:
  • Danieli do Amaral, Artur
  • Manuel Correa, Facundo Juan

Abstract

Background: Anatomy is a fundamental subject in medical education and, in recent years, traditional cadaveric dissection has increasingly been complemented by digital tools such as virtual and three-dimensional resources. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional online survey was administered to 135 medical students from first to sixth year enrolled in different schools in Buenos Aires City, gathering information on how they had taken Anatomy, their use of technology, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and preferences regarding cadavers and digital resources. Results: Most students rated both cadaveric practice and technological tools positively but clearly favored a blended approach; more than half would still choose dissection if they had to select a single method, whereas many reported that technology improved understanding and supported out-of-class review, particularly among those who studied during the COVID‑19 pandemic using virtual formats. Conclusion: Students do not view the issue as choosing between cadavers or technology, but rather express a desire to learn with both, suggesting that the most appropriate educational strategy is to deliberately combine traditional cadaver-based teaching with digital tools.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cwf:grarti:gr2026250
DOI: 10.62486/gr2026250
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/gr/gr2026250en.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/gr/gr2026250es.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62486/gr2026250?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwf:grarti:gr2026250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: South American Publishing Journals Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.southam.pub/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.