IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvp/aiciss/v4y2026i2id198.html

Tony Barreiro, Emilio de los Santos, and the Crisis of the Triumvirate: A Political and Anthropological Reading of Las Manaclas

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Burgos-Díaz

    (Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña)

Abstract

This article analyzes the events at Las Manaclas in 1963 and their connection to the political crisis of the Dominican Triumvirate. Drawing on newspaper archives, eyewitness accounts, bibliographic sources, and diplomatic documents, the study examines the discrepancies between the official version—which presented the deaths of Manolo Tavárez Justo and other members of the June 14 Revolutionary Movement as the result of combat—and subsequent testimonies that assert they surrendered and were subsequently executed. The study interprets Emilio de los Santos’s resignation as the result of a convergence of factors: the institutional fragility of the Triumvirate, its dependence on the Armed Forces, the controversy generated by Las Manaclas, and the rejection of the violence used against the insurgents. Furthermore, the study analyzes the godfather-godson relationship between De los Santos and Tony Barreiro as a sociocultural dimension that may have intensified the moral impact of the episode, without considering it the sole cause of the resignation. It concludes that Las Manaclas deepened the loss of legitimacy of the government that emerged from the coup against Juan Bosch and highlighted the tensions between civil authority, military power, and state violence.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cvp:aiciss:v:4:y:2026:i:2:id:198
DOI: 10.69821/AICIS.v4i2.198
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis/article/view/198
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis/article/download/198/159
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.69821/AICIS.v4i2.198?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvp:aiciss:v:4:y:2026:i:2:id:198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Roman Acosta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.