IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvp/aiciss/v1y2023i1id25.html

Doing science within the framework of philosophical pluralism: science from the perspective of the dialogue of knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Teresa Medina Arnedo

    (University of Cartagena)

  • Carlos Alberto Severiche Sierra

    (University of Cartagena)

  • Yesid Alejandro Marrugo Ligardo

    (University of Cartagena)

Abstract

This article explores how the practice of science can be reconfigured within the framework of philosophical pluralism, proposing an enriching dialogue between modern Western sciences and the ancestral knowledge of Indigenous cultures, also known as endogenous sciences. Throughout the text, it is argued that modern science, founded on empiricism and objectivity, has been successful in developing theories and technologies, but has tended to decontextualize phenomena and exclude other forms of knowledge. In contrast, endogenous sciences, linked to the worldview of Indigenous peoples, offer a holistic and contextualized understanding that integrates nature, the spiritual, and the community. Philosophical pluralism, by recognizing the validity of diverse epistemological traditions, invites us to go beyond the univocal view of science and opens the door to an exchange of knowledge that not only enriches scientific knowledge but also promotes a more inclusive and equitable science. The article highlights the tensions that can arise in this dialogue, such as power asymmetries and the possible decontextualization of Indigenous knowledge but also highlights the opportunities this encounter offers to address global challenges such as climate change, health, and sustainability. In conclusion, the article proposes that conducting science within a framework of philosophical pluralism can lead to a more integrative science capable of addressing contemporary problems holistically, respecting epistemological and cultural diversity. Collaboration between Western and Indigenous sciences, far from being conflictual, can be a powerful tool for generating more complete and contextualized knowledge.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cvp:aiciss:v:1:y:2023:i:1:id:25
DOI: 10.69821/AICIS.v1i1.25
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis/article/view/25
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis/article/download/25/83
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.69821/AICIS.v1i1.25?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvp:aiciss:v:1:y:2023:i:1:id:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Roman Acosta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://plagcis.com/index.php/aicis .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.