IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v4y2025i4p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An X-Ray of the Implementation of Separation of Powers Within the Cameroon Political Regime

Author

Listed:
  • Noelyne Namondo Joso Etongo

    (PhD Fellow, University of Buea, Cameroon)

Abstract

Theoretically, the 1996 Constitution of Cameroon formally establishes a tripartite system of governance dividing powers among the executive, legislature and judiciary. However, the actual configuration of power reveals a dominance of the executive, a docile legislature, and a politicized judiciary. The central question addressed is to what extent does the Separation of Powers, as enshrined in Cameroon’s constitutional framework, reflect the reality of governance and institutional practice? With an objective to evaluate the operational independence and functional integrity of state institutions vis-à-vis their constitutional mandates and to highlight the structural and political barriers hindering effective Separation of Powers. Anchored on the theoretical lens of Constitutionalism and checks and balances, the paper draws from scholarly literature, legal texts and contemporary political events to provide a grounded analysis of Cameroon’s regime dynamics. The study reveals executive dominance, legislature subordination and judicial suppression. This analysis is given timely given Cameroon’s democratic backsliding and institutional stagnation. It contributes to debates on governance reform by making recommendations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:43-53
DOI: 10.63593/SSSH.2709-7862.2025.07.006
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1713/1541
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/SSSH.2709-7862.2025.07.006?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.