Author
Listed:
- Lagat Fredrick Kiprop
- Dr. Joel Tenai
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of risk monitoring on performance of financial institutions. Methodology: The study used explanatory research design. The study used stratified random sampling to select respondents from target population comprising of managers of 46 commercial banks, 52 Micro Finance institutions (MFIs) and 200 SACCOs and a sample size of 239 respondents obtained. Data was collected using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was presented, while inferential statistics was done using Pearson product moment correlation. Results: Risk monitoring [r = 0.206, p<.05] had a positive relationship performance of financial institutions. The more there was risk monitoring the higher the performance of financial institutions. A proper risk monitoring practices was used to ensure that risks are in line with financial institution's management goals in order to uncover mistakes at early stages. The risk monitoring had positive relationship on performance of financial institutions (P<0.05). The null hypothesis (HO4) stating that there is no significant effect of risk monitoring on the performance of financial institutions was rejected. The risk evaluation should be enhanced so as to enhance the performance of financial institutions. These may be achieved through establishing regulatory mechanism that can be adopted to enhance effective risk identification. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The risk monitoring should be enhanced so as to enhance the performance of financial institutions. These may be achieved through establishing regulatory mechanism that can be adopted to enhance effective risk identification. Key words: Risk montoring, performance, financial institutions
Suggested Citation
Lagat Fredrick Kiprop & Dr. Joel Tenai, 2017.
"Effect Of Risk Monitoring On Performance Of Financial Institutions,"
European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 2(6), pages 80-89`1.
Handle:
RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:80-9`1:id:452
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:80-9`1:id:452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.