IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jweep0/v5y2023i3id6436.html

Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET) for Improving Learning and Teaching Quality in HE: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ibtisam Al Kharusi

    (Lecturer, English Language Center, University of Technology and Applied Science, Muscat-Oman)

Abstract

Various academic institutions in higher education (HE) allocate their resources differently to improve the quality of teaching and learning. To measure and identify the teaching and learning quality in any educational context, institution performance in this field must be evaluated using different techniques and instruments, one of which is Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET). The study aims to determine the use of SET to improve teaching quality based on the opinions of teachers (n = 6) and students (n = 413). This is achieved by investigating 1) the degree of alignment or divergence between teachers’ and students’ ratings of a particular course, 2) how teachers value students’ feedback on teaching to improve their teaching practises, 3) students’ perspectives on using SET in improving teaching quality and 4) the implications for implementing SET effectively in HE context. These were addressed using an adapted version of the Students’ Course Evaluation Questionnaire (SCEQ), and the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the data. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.739) between teachers’ and students’ evaluations. The associated p-value (0.058) is slightly greater than the conventional threshold of p ≤ 0.05. The results of the Mann-Whitney U test indicated an overall concurrence between teachers’ and students’ evaluations, although certain inconsistencies were observed. The findings indicate a consensus among teachers and students regarding SET’s efficacy in enhancing instructional quality.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:alk:jweep0:v:5:y:2023:i:3:id:6436
DOI: 10.32996/jweep.2023.5.3.8
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jweep/article/view/6436
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jweep/article/download/6436/5343
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jweep.2023.5.3.8?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jweep0:v:5:y:2023:i:3:id:6436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jweep .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.