IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jefas0/v6y2024i5id7735.html

Comparative Analysis of Performance between Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units using the Eagles Method for the 2021-2023 Period

Author

Listed:
  • Safitriyanti Safitriyanti

    (Universitas Jambi, Indonesia)

  • Wiralestari Wiralestari

    (Universitas Jambi, Indonesia)

  • Rico Wijaya Z

    (Universitas Jambi, Indonesia)

Abstract

This research aims to see how the performance compares between Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units using the EAGLES method in the 2021-2023 period. The population of this research is all Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units registered with the financial services authority, totaling 38 banks. Using purposive sampling, the sample in this research is 31 banks, consisting of 12 Sharia Commercial Banks and 19 Sharia Business Units. The method used in this research is quantitative, with secondary data obtained from the financial reports of each Sharia Commercial Bank and Sharia Business Unit, which have been published on the financial services authority website or through the website of each Bank. The data analysis method used is an independent sample t-test. The results of this research show that based on the Eagles method, there are no significant differences in the ratios of ROA, NPF, LGR, DGR, and SRQ by personnel between Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units. Meanwhile, the FDR and CAR ratios have significant differences between Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units. The results of comparing each ratio between Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units show that, in general, the performance of Sharia Business Units is better than that of Sharia Commercial Banks, as seen from the average value of each ratio.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:alk:jefas0:v:6:y:2024:i:5:id:7735
DOI: 10.32996/jefas.2024.6.5.2
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jefas/article/view/7735
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jefas/article/download/7735/6574
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jefas.2024.6.5.2?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jefas0:v:6:y:2024:i:5:id:7735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jefas .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.