Author
Listed:
- Zainab Haruna
(Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria)
- Aishatu Habib Idris
(Department of Microbiology, Edo State University, Uzairue, Edo State, Nigeria)
- Maryam Idris Muhammad
(Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria)
- Nana Maryam Abdulwahab
(Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria)
- Saadatu Abdullahi
(Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria)
- Nafiu Muhammad Wada
(Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria)
Abstract
Urine specimens were collected aseptically and inoculated directly onto CLED and MacConkey agar medium and incubated overnight. Single target colonies were sub cultured, and identification was based on culture, morphology, and biochemical characteristics. Enterococci isolates were subjected to biofilm assay (Tube method), and resistance pattern was determined for both biofilm-formers and non-biofilm-formers. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Bioneer kit, and the gene for virulence was detected by PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. 148 Patients having one or more urinary symptoms were the study population. The aim of the study was to determine the multidrug resistant ability of biofilm-forming Enterococci. A number of growths were encountered; Enterococci accounted for only 9.46% (14), the highest prevalence was seen in the age group 21-30 (35.71%), and females (64.29%) were more prone to enterococcal infection than their males (35.71) counterpart. There is a relationship between biofilm production and antibiotic resistance because multidrug resistant Enterococci isolate produced bands against esp gene with an average of 510kbp. Biofilm forming strains showed the highest resistance to gentamicin and penicillin (83.3%), and vancomycin can be considered a good alternative therapy in enterococcal UTIs because of its lower resistance (75%).
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:alk:ijbpcs:v:4:y:2022:i:1:id:2938
DOI: 10.32996/ijbpcs.2022.4.1.1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:ijbpcs:v:4:y:2022:i:1:id:2938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijbpcs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.