IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/mccss1/v3y2024i3p137-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Intersection of AI and Mental Health: A Review of Advances, Ethics, and Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Qamar Shabir Rana

    (University of Punjab Lahore)

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into mental healthcare represents a transformative shift in addressing mental health as a critical component of overall well-being. As mental health disorders like depression and anxiety become leading contributors to global disability and economic loss, traditional care models struggle to keep pace with the increasing demand for accessible and scalable services. AI offers the potential to revolutionize mental health care through advanced detection techniques, personalized therapies, and virtual therapeutic platforms, thereby expanding access and reducing stigma. This narrative review systematically explores the ethical considerations of AI in mental health interventions. A comprehensive literature search across multiple academic databases identified 51 relevant studies, which were analyzed to understand key ethical concerns and the integration of ethical principles into AI development. The review highlights the evolution of AI in mental healthcare, from early symbolic AI to advanced applications like virtual therapists and emotion-tracking tools. The findings underscore AI's role in enhancing early detection, personalizing treatment, and supporting continuous monitoring. However, the integration of AI in mental health care raises significant ethical and regulatory challenges, including privacy concerns, bias, and the preservation of human empathy in therapy. Effective regulation and ongoing research are essential to address these challenges and ensure that AI technologies improve rather than compromise care quality. In conclusion, while AI holds promise for transforming mental health care by making it more accessible and personalized, balancing innovation with ethical responsibility is crucial. The future of AI in mental health will depend on developing robust regulatory frameworks, ensuring transparency and validation of AI models, and maintaining a focus on ethical standards to foster equitable and effective mental health services.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:137-145
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/983/1520
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/983
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:137-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Shehzad Hassan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.