Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Transport Economics, as of February 2013
This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the
RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on
EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by
RePEc, citation analysis performed by
CitEc and popularity data compiled by
LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click
here. Or see the
ranking FAQ.
For Transport Economics, these are 89 authors affiliated with 323 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.
Top 10% institutions in the field of Transport Economics
The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in
NEP that have also been announced in
NEP-TRE (Transport Economics).
Rank | Institution | Score | Authors | Author shares |
--- | Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE) London, United Kingdom | 1.47 | 60 | 24.85 |
1 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands | 1.85 | 96 | 70.73 |
--- | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands | 2.91 | 34 | 24.38 |
2 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Bonn, Germany | 3.12 | 621 | 87.7 |
--- | Department of Economics, School of Business, Management and Economics, University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom | 4.9 | 46 | 33.28 |
3 | School of Business, Management and Economics, University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom | 4.9 | 71 | 52.35 |
4 | Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium | 7.03 | 106 | 72.3 |
--- | Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium | 8.05 | 52 | 37.9 |
5 | London School of Economics (LSE) London, United Kingdom | 8.23 | 230 | 158.38 |
6 | Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis (RCEA) Rimini, Italy | 11.2 | 88 | 12.26 |
7 | Networks, Economics and Urban Systems Research Group (Nexus), University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota (USA) | 12.64 | 1 | 1 |
8 | Tinbergen Instituut Amsterdam, Netherlands | 13.29 | 149 | 33.32 |
9 | Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) Toulouse, France | 15.87 | 145 | 121.09 |
10 | Department of Economics, New York University (NYU) New York City, New York (USA) | 17.9 | 57 | 45.16 |
11 | Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine Irvine, California (USA) | 18.67 | 31 | 28.28 |
12 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) London, United Kingdom | 18.76 | 273 | 22.21 |
13 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands | 20.68 | 10 | 7.98 |
14 | Department of Economics, University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon (USA) | 22.14 | 15 | 14.96 |
15 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE) Paris, France | 22.43 | 177 | 149.18 |
16 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois (USA) | 22.69 | 34 | 30.5 |
17 | Paris School of Economics Paris, France | 23.82 | 196 | 115.92 |
18 | Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles, Belgium | 24.39 | 144 | 105.44 |
--- | European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles, Belgium | 24.39 | 56 | 39.51 |
19 | Department of Economics, University of California-Riverside Riverside, California (USA) | 24.9 | 15 | 14.39 |
20 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) | 26.28 | 30 | 25.32 |
21 | World Bank Group Washington, District of Columbia (USA) | 27.97 | 349 | 289.42 |
22 | Institute for Policy Research (IPR), Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois (USA) | 28.81 | 4 | 2.65 |
23 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco San Francisco, California (USA) | 30.23 | 36 | 32.06 |
24 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) | 30.6 | 466 | 50.39 |
25 | Stern School of Business, New York University (NYU) New York City, New York (USA) | 31.75 | 44 | 39.13 |
--- | Economics Department, Stern School of Business, New York University (NYU) New York City, New York (USA) | 31.75 | 21 | 18.9 |
26 | Department of Economics, University College London (UCL) London, United Kingdom | 31.82 | 61 | 46.87 |
--- | Economics Department, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE) Paris, France | 33.81 | 62 | 51.85 |
27 | Facoltà di Economia, Università degli Studi di Genova Genova, Italy | 34.15 | 9 | 8.87 |
28 | Economics Department, Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire (USA) | 36.54 | 30 | 27.96 |
29 | Resources for the Future (RFF) Washington, District of Columbia (USA) | 37.08 | 34 | 26 |
30 | Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver Denver, Colorado (USA) | 37.14 | 3 | 2.31 |
--- | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco San Francisco, California (USA) | 39.39 | 34 | 28.32 |
31 | Institut for Transport, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Lyngby, Denmark | 41.7 | 1 | 1 |
32 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley Berkeley, California (USA) | 41.84 | 19 | 17.18 |
Top 10% authors in the field of Transport Economics
This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the
RePEc Author Service.
Rank | Author | Score |
1 | Stef Proost Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium | 1.11 |
2 | David Matthew Levinson Networks, Economics and Urban Systems Research Group (Nexus), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (USA) | 2.22 |
3 | Antonio Estache European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium | 3.96 |
4 | Michael L. Anderson Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California (USA) | 6.11 |
5 | Alessandro Gavazza Economics Department, Stern School of Business, New York University (NYU), New York City, New York (USA) | 6.39 |
6 | Jonas Eliasson | 6.59 |
7 | Erik Teodoor Verhoef Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands | 7.26 |
8 | Mogens Fosgerau Institut for Transport, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Lyngby, Denmark | 9.04 |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
- Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
- Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
- Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
- Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.
We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.