Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 12.5% Mountain States (United States), as of August 2012

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Mountain States (United States), these are 61 institutions and 258 authors.

Top 12.5% institutions in Mountain States (United States)

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Tempe, Arizona (USA)

12924.73
(2)[2]Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Tempe, Arizona (USA)

2.022218.72
2[2]Department of Economics, University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado (USA)

32319.72
3[4]Department of Economics, Brigham Young University

Provo, Utah (USA)

4.751817.98
4[3]College of Business, University of Wyoming

Laramie, Wyoming (USA)

4.8888
(4)[4]Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming

Laramie, Wyoming (USA)

4.8888
5[5]Economics Department, University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona (USA)

6.5997.08
6[6]Santa Fe Institute

Santa Fe, New Mexico (USA)

7.7885.54
7[7]Department of Economics, University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA)

9.791413.89

Top 12.5% authors in Mountain States (United States)

RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[3]Richard Rogerson

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

2.08
2[1]Edward C. Prescott

Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota (USA)

2.19
3[5]V. Kerry Smith

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

3.95
4[2]James R. Markusen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA)

4.04
5[4]Jason Shogren

Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming (USA)

4.58
6[9]Wolfgang Keller

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA)

7.53
7[10]Lawrence Edward Blume

Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico (USA)

10.33
8[11]Herbert Gintis

Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico (USA)

10.56
9[7]Stephen M. Miller

Department of Economics, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada (USA)

11.08
10[15]Ronald L. Oaxaca

Economics Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)

11.3
11[16]Hendrik Bessembinder

Department of Finance, David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (USA)

12.37
12[14]Sherrill Shaffer

Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming (USA)

14
13[13]Edward B. Barbier

Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming (USA)

14.37
14[17]Yongmin Chen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA)

14.84
15[20]Lars Lefgren

Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (USA)

16.23
16[8]Rajnish Mehra

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)
Luxembourg School of Finance, Faculté de droit, d'économie et de finance, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

16.88
17[6]Keith E. Maskus

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA)

16.93
18[19]Price Vanmeter Fishback

Economics Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)

17.69
19[22]Robert Innes

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)

18.07
20[21]Jeffrey L. Coles

Department of Finance, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

18.44
21[23]Michael R Ransom

Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (USA)

18.84
22[24]Luc Anselin

GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

19.28
23[18]Josef C. Brada

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

20.6
24[12]L. Randall Wray

Department of Economics, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado (USA)

21.75
25[27]Andreas Blume

Economics Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)

21.94
26[28]Dan Silverman

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

22.7
27[31]Gustavo Jaime Ventura

W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

23.45
28[33]Manuel Santos

Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (USA)

25.95
29[35]James McDonald

Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (USA)

28.33
30[38]Val Eugene Lambson

Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (USA)

30.23
31[39]Keisuke Hirano

Economics Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)

30.24
32[37]Daniel I. Rees

Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado (USA)

30.49

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.