IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbslm/spi2021501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Erste Befunde aus dem Projekt "MATH+ as a Research Object": Karriereziele, -wissen und -handeln, Nachwuchsförderung und Rekrutierung

Author

Listed:
  • Hofmeister, Sophie
  • Lindenau, Johannes
  • Mischau, Anina
  • Ransiek, Anna
  • Solga, Heike

Abstract

[Vorbemerkung] Dies sind erste Ergebnisse aus dem Projekt "MATH+ as a research object", das Teil des Clusters MATH+ der Exzellenzstrategie von Bund und Ländern zur Stärkung universitärer Spitzenforschung ist.1 In dem Projekt werden die Reproduktionsmechanismen von Geschlechterasymmetrien in der Mathematik sowie das ungleichheitsreduzierende Potenzial karriere- und gleichstellungsunterstützender Maßnahmen untersucht. Das Projekt selbst ist als Teil der Gleichstellungs- und Diversity-Maßnahmen des Clusters konzipiert. Von daher hat es neben einer wissenschaftlichen Perspektive zugleich eine anwendungsorientierte Komponente, nämlich dem Cluster Informationen zu liefern, um empirisch fundiert die Weiterentwicklung dieser Maßnahmen sowie die Verringerung von Geschlechterungleichheiten voranzubringen. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben wir den detaillierten Analysen eine ausführlichere Zusammenfassung vorangestellt, die einen verständlichen und fokussierten Zugang auch für nicht-sozialwissenschaftliche Leser:innnen bieten soll.

Suggested Citation

  • Hofmeister, Sophie & Lindenau, Johannes & Mischau, Anina & Ransiek, Anna & Solga, Heike, 2021. "Erste Befunde aus dem Projekt "MATH+ as a Research Object": Karriereziele, -wissen und -handeln, Nachwuchsförderung und Rekrutierung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2021-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbslm:spi2021501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/244724/1/1775307948.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Mihaljević-Brandt & Lucía Santamaría & Marco Tullney, 2016. "The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Chad M Topaz & Shilad Sen, 2016. "Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwiek, Marek & Roszka, Wojciech, 2021. "Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    2. Mengyu Yu & Mazie Krehbiel & Samantha Thompson & Tatjana Miljkovic, 2020. "An exploration of gender gap using advanced data science tools: actuarial research community," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 767-789, May.
    3. Lin Zhang & Yuanyuan Shang & Ying Huang & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2022. "Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 145-179, January.
    4. Josh Yamamoto & Eitan Frachtenberg, 2022. "Gender Differences in Collaboration Patterns in Computer Science," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Fengyuan Liu & Petter Holme & Matteo Chiesa & Bedoor AlShebli & Talal Rahwan, 2023. "Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 353-364, March.
    6. Zhang, Lin & Shang, Yuanyuan & HUANG, Ying & Sivertsen, Gunnar, 2021. "Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons," SocArXiv 4z6w8, Center for Open Science.
    7. Francisco González Sala & Julia Osca Lluch & Francisco Tortosa Gil & María Peñaranda Ortega, 2017. "Characteristics of monographic special issues in Ibero-American psychology journals: visibility and relevance for authors and publishers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 1069-1077, August.
    8. Chad M. Topaz & Jude Higdon & Avriel Epps-Darling & Ethan Siau & Harper Kerkhoff & Shivani Mendiratta & Eric Young, 2022. "Race- and gender-based under-representation of creative contributors: art, fashion, film, and music," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Hamid R. Jamali & Alireza Abbasi, 2023. "Gender gaps in Australian research publishing, citation and co-authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2879-2893, May.
    10. Caroline Wagner, 2016. "Rosalind’s Ghost: Biology, Collaboration, and the Female," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-5, November.
    11. Ana Teresa Santos & Sandro Mendonça, 2022. "The small world of innovation studies: an “editormetrics” perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7471-7486, December.
    12. Cristina Rodríguez-Faneca & Alexander Maz-Machado & David Gutiérrez-Rubio & Cristina Pedrosa-Jesús, 2022. "Presence of women on the editorial boards of the language and linguistics journals in Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4237-4249, July.
    13. Luke Holman & Devi Stuart-Fox & Cindy E Hauser, 2018. "The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Auschra, Carolin & Bartosch, Julia & Lohmeyer, Nora, 2022. "Differences in female representation in leading management and organization journals: Establishing a benchmark," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    15. Marek Kwiek & Wojciech Roszka, 2022. "Are female scientists less inclined to publish alone? The gender solo research gap," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1697-1735, April.
    16. Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2020. "Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2421-2447, December.
    17. Abra Brisbin & Ursula Whitcher, 2018. "Women’s Representation in Mathematics Subfields: Evidence from the arXiv," The Mathematical Intelligencer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 38-49, March.
    18. Helena Mihaljević & Lucía Santamaría, 2021. "Disambiguation of author entities in ADS using supervised learning and graph theory methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3893-3917, May.
    19. Somayeh Mohammadi Hamidi & Mohammad Rezaei-Pandari & Sima Fakheran & Christine Fürst, 2022. "The Gender Gap in Land Sciences: A Review of Women’s Presence on the Editorial Boards of Peer-Reviewed Journals," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbslm:spi2021501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aawzbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.