Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production


Author Info

  • Amable, Bruno


According to the contemporary political economy literature on France, the country appears caught in the worst of all possible worlds: it fails to create the conditions for economic growth and employment by deregulating labour markets as the UK has done, and it lacks the institutional infrastructure that makes the German economy an export success. This paper, which analyses the adjustment of the French economy in the 1980s and into the 1990s, argues that this image of France is wrong. This literature misunderstands the relative position of French industry and misinterprets how firms managed to successfully make the transition from conventional mass production to flexible quality production. The particular French mode of coordination, revolving around the state-centered elite political-economic structure, was at the basis of this adjustment path. The paper analyses how this mode of coordination interacted with the crisis of the French production regime in the early 1980s, and with the changes in the ownership structures of large firms in response to that crisis. The resulting corporate governance structure increased the autonomy of top management from the state as well as capital markets, and led to a situation whereby far-reaching organisational changes in the large companies could be pursued. -- Der gegenwärtigen Fachliteratur zufolge befindet sich die französische Volkswirtschaft in einer äußerst problematischen Lage: Versuche, die Bedingungen für Wirtschaftswachstum und neue Arbeitsplätze durch Deregulierung nach britischem Vorbild zu schaffen, schlagen fehl. Die institutionelle Infrastruktur, auf welcher die deutsche Exportstärke beruht, ist aber ebensowenig gegeben. Das vorliegende Papier, in dem die Anpassung der französischen Wirtschaft in den achtziger und bis in die neunziger Jahre hinein analysiert wird, argumentiert, daß dieses Frankreichbild falsch ist. Es beruht auf einer Fehlinterpretation der Art und Weise, in der es Firmen gelungen ist, den Übergang von herkömmlicher Massenproduktion zu flexiblen, qualitätsorientierten Herstellungsverfahren zu schaffen. Die besondere französische Art der Koordination, die auf einer staatszentrierten, elitegeprägten wirtschaftspolitischen Struktur basiert, bildete die Grundlage dieses Anpassungspfades. Das Papier untersucht, welchen Einfluß diese Art der Koordination auf die Krise des französischen Produktionsregimes zu Beginn der achtziger Jahre sowie auf die daraus resultierenden Veränderungen in der Eigentumsstruktur großer Unternehmen hatte. Die Corporate Governance Struktur, die das Ergebnis dieses Prozesses war, erhöhte die Unabhängigkeit von Spitzenmanagern gegenüber Staat und Kapitalmärkten und schuf damit die Möglichkeit zu weitreichenden organisatorischen Veränderungen innerhalb der großen Unternehmen.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) in its series Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment with number FS I 99-309.

as in new window
Date of creation: 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbece:fsi99309

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin, Germany
Phone: ++49 - 30 - 25491 - 0
Fax: ++49 - 30 - 25491 - 684
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research



References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Nathan Sussman & Yishay Yafeh, 1998. "Institutions, Reforms, and Country Risk: Lessons from Japanese Government Debt in the Meiji Period," CIRJE F-Series, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo CIRJE-F-20, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
  2. Petit, Pascal, 1998. "Formes structurelles et régimes de croissance de l'après fordisme," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9818, CEPREMAP.
  3. Richard R. Nelson, 1995. "Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 48-90, March.
  4. Casper, Steven, 1998. "The legal framework for corporate governance: explaining the development of contract law in Germany and the United States," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 98-303, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
  5. Casper, Steven, 1999. "National institutional frameworks and high-technology innovation in Germany: the case of biotechnology," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 99-306, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
  6. Jean-Bernard Chatelain & Bruno Amable, 1995. "Systèmes financiers et croissance : les effets du "court-termisme"," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(3), pages 827-836.
  7. Freeman, Chris, 1995. "The 'National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 5-24, February.
  8. Soskice, David, 1996. "German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 96-319, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
  9. Douglass C. North, 1994. "Institutions Matter," Economic History, EconWPA 9411004, EconWPA.
  10. Palokangas, Tapio, 1996. "Endogenous growth and collective bargaining," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 925-944, May.
  11. Amable, Bruno & Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & De Bandt, Olivier, 1998. "Stability versus efficiency of the banking sector and economic growth," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9811, CEPREMAP.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbece:fsi99309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.