IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wsistu/12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Upgrading German public services: The role of trade union campaigns and collective bargaining with regard to working conditions in day care centres, primary education and hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Schulten, Thorsten
  • Seikel, Daniel

Abstract

The development of the public sector in Germany during the last decade differs fundamentally from the experiences of many other European countries. In many respects Germany can be seen as forerunner of public sector reforms in Europe. Austerity-driven reforms of the public sector have been conducted long before the crisis, already starting in the 1990s. During this phase, public employment decreased and working conditions deteriorated. Privatizations led to a fragmentation of collective bargaining. However, the development of the German public sector changed direction in the second half of the 2000s. Since then, public sector employment increased and working conditions have been improved. This holds true, in particular, for public care services such as the three branches analysed in this study: day care centres, primary education and hospitals. As this study shows, trade unions played a major role in this process of upgrading public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulten, Thorsten & Seikel, Daniel, 2018. "Upgrading German public services: The role of trade union campaigns and collective bargaining with regard to working conditions in day care centres, primary education and hospitals," WSI Studies 12, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wsistu:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/225435/1/wsi-study-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glassner, Vera & Pernicka, Susanne & Dittmar, Nele, 2015. "Arbeitsbeziehungen im Krankenhaussektor," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 306, June.
    2. Berndt Keller & Hartmut Seifert, 2015. "Atypical Forms of Employment in the Public Sector - Are There Any?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 774, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Schulten, Thorsten & Schulze-Buschoff, Karin, 2015. "Sector-level strategies against precarious employment in Germany: Evidence from construction, commercial cleaning, hospitals and temporary agency work," WSI Working Papers 197, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Dieter Vesper, 2016. "Aktuelle Entwicklungstendenzen und zukünftiger Personalbedarf im Öffentlichen Dienst," IMK Studies 51-2016, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    5. Seils, Eric, 2013. "Die Betreuung von Kindern unter drei Jahren: Deutschland im Vergleich von 18 westeuropäischen Ländern," WSI Reports 09, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    6. Conrads, Ralph & Holler, Markus & Kistler, Ernst & Kühn, Daniel & Schneider, Daniela, 2016. "Branchenanalyse Gesundheits- und Sozialwesen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 005, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    7. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2015. "Atypical forms of employment in the public sector: Are there any?," WSI Working Papers 199, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    8. Daniel Seikel, 2016. "Flexible Austerity and Supranational Autonomy. The Reformed Excessive Deficit Procedure and the Asymmetry between Liberalization and Social Regulation in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1398-1416, November.
    9. Schulten, Thorsten & Brandt, Torsten, 2008. "Liberalisierung und Privatisierung öffentlicher Dienstleistungen und die Erosion des Flächentarifvertrags," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 61(10), pages 570-576.
    10. Pieper, Wolfgang & Wegner, Alexander, 2015. "Aufwertung muss sein – von der gewerkschaftlichen Forderung zum Gesellschaftlichen Konsens," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 68(8), pages 639-641.
    11. Heiner Dribbusch & Thorsten Schulten, 2007. "The End of an Era: Structural Changes in German Public Sector Collective Bargaining," Chapters, in: Peter Leisink & Bram Stejin & Ulke Veersma (ed.), Industrial Relations in the New Europe, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Ian Greer & Thorsten Schulten & Nils Böhlke, 2013. "How Does Market Making Affect Industrial Relations? Evidence from Eight German Hospitals," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 215-239, June.
    13. Schulz, Susanne Eva, 2017. "Arbeiten im Krankenhaus: der Umgang von Beschäftigten mit der Ökonomisierung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(3), pages 205-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schröder, Doris & Lübker, Malte & Schulten, Thorsten, 2021. "Tarifverträge und Tarifflucht in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern," WSI Studies 25, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonaccolto-Töpfer, Marina & Castagnetti, Carolina & Prümer, Stephanie, 2022. "Understanding the public-private sector wage gap in Germany: New evidence from a Fixed Effects quantile Approach∗," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Di Carlo, Donato, 2018. "Does pattern bargaining explain wage restraint in the German public sector?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Ruoff, Bea., 2016. "Labour market developments in Germany : tales of decency and stability," ILO Working Papers 994899913402676, International Labour Organization.
    4. Nora Albu & Heike Joebges & Rudolf Zwiener, 2018. "Increasing competitiveness at any price?," IMK Working Paper 192-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    5. Kölling, Arnd, 2023. "Does skill shortage pay off for nursing staff in Germany? Wage premiums for hiring problems, industrial relations, and profitability," MPRA Paper 116205, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Achim Truger, 2020. "Reforming EU Fiscal Rules: More Leeway, Investment Orientation and Democratic Coordination," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(5), pages 277-281, September.
    7. Johannes Karremans, 2021. "This Time Wasn't Different: Responsiveness and Responsibility in the Eurozone between 2007 and 2019," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1536-1554, November.
    8. Martin Sacher, 2021. "Avoiding the Inappropriate: The European Commission and Sanctions under the Stability and Growth Pact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 163-172.
    9. Beatrice Carella & Paolo Graziano, 2022. "Back to the Future in EU Social Policy? Endogenous Critical Junctures and the Case of the European Pillar of Social Rights," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 374-390, March.
    10. Reinout A van der Veer & Markus Haverland, 2018. "Bread and butter or bread and circuses? Politicisation and the European Commission in the European Semester," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 524-545, September.
    11. Genevieve Coderre-LaPalme & Ian Greer & Lisa Schulte, 2023. "Welfare, Work and the Conditions of Social Solidarity: British Campaigns to Defend Healthcare and Social Security," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 352-372, April.
    12. Muireann O'Dwyer, 2022. "Gender and Crises in European Economic Governance: Is this Time Different?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 152-169, January.
    13. Peter Hohlfeld & Katja Rietzler & Sabine Stephan & Thomas Theobald & Silke Tober & Sebastian Watzka, 2017. "Aufschwung breit aufgestellt! Prognose-Update: Die konjunkturelle Lage in Deutschland zur Jahreswende 2017/2018," IMK Report 132-2017, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    14. Markus Helfen & Jörg Sydow & Carsten Wirth, 2020. "Service Delivery Networks and Employment Relations at German Airports: Jeopardizing Industrial Peace on the Ground?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 168-198, March.
    15. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    16. Jörg Flecker & Franz Schultheis & Berthold Vogel, 2016. "A ‘Problem of Fairness’ in the Making: The Transformation of Public Services from the Perspective of Postal Workers," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 768-789, December.
    17. Cyril Jayet, 2020. "The Meaning of the European Union and Public Support for European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1144-1164, September.
    18. Nick Krachler & Jennie Auffenberg & Luigi Wolf, 2021. "The Role of Organizational Factors in Mobilizing Professionals: Evidence from Nurse Unions in the United States and Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 643-668, September.
    19. Manuela Galetto, 2017. "Organised decentralisation, uneven outcomes: employment relations in the Italian public health sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 196-217, May.
    20. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2018. "International monetary regimes and the German model," MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wsistu:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wsihbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.