This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Does tax simplification yield more equity and efficiency? An empirical analysis for Germany

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Peichl, Andreas
Fuest, Clemens
Schaefer, Thilo

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of tax simplification on various indicators of the efficiency of the tax system and on the distribution of income. The analysis is based on a simulation model (FiFoSiM) using German income tax and household survey microdata. We model tax simplification as the abolition of a set of deductions from the tax base included in the German income tax system. We find that this form of tax base simplification leads to a reduction in the use of professional tax advice, a more equitable income distribution and an increase in tax revenue. If these measures are combined with a reduction of income tax rates to preserve revenue neutrality, the effects depend on the type of rate schedule adjustment. The combination with a flat rate tax implies redistribution in favour of very high incomes, and an overall increase in income inequality. Efficiency effects in terms of changes in marginal tax rates and labor supply effects are mixed. The combination with a rate schedule adjustment which preserves the directly progressive rate schedule yields a tax reform which reduces the inequality of after tax incomes. We conclude that tax simplification may improve the efficiency of the tax system without increasing inequality of after tax income. --

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/23255/1/FiFo_FD_06-5.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Cologne, CPE - Cologne Center for Public Economics in its series FiFo-CPE Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge with number 06-5.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:uoccpe:5147

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.fifo-koeln.de/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (ZBW - German National Library for Economics).

Related research
Keywords: Income distribution; polarisation; tax simplification; flat tax;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Schaefer, Thilo & Peichl, Andreas, 2006. "Documentation FiFoSiM : integrated tax benefit microsimulation and CGE model," FiFo-CPE Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 06-10, University of Cologne, CPE - Cologne Center for Public Economics. [Downloadable!]
  2. Schaefer, Thilo & Peichl, Andreas & Fuest, Clemens, 2007. "Is a Flat Tax politically feasible in a grown-up Welfare State?," FiFo-CPE Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 07-6, University of Cologne, CPE - Cologne Center for Public Economics. [Downloadable!]
  3. Peichl, Andreas & Schaefer, Thilo & Scheicher, Christoph, 2006. "Measuring Richness and Poverty," FiFo-CPE Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 06-11, University of Cologne, CPE - Cologne Center for Public Economics. [Downloadable!]
  4. Peichl, Andreas & Mitschke, Joachim & Fuest, Clemens & Schaefer, Thilo, 2007. "Wider die Arbeitslosigkeit der beruflich Geringqualifizierten : Entwurf eines Kombilohn-Verfahrens für den Niedriglohnsektor," FiFo-CPE Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 07-1, University of Cologne, CPE - Cologne Center for Public Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl & Thilo Schaefer, 2007. "Is a Flat Tax Feasible in a Grown-up Welfare State?," IZA Discussion Papers 3142, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.