IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/rwimat/93.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie unbeliebt ist Kohle und wie beliebt sind die Erneuerbaren? Eine empirische Regionalanalyse der energiepolitischen Präferenzen deutscher Haushalte

Author

Listed:
  • Andor, Mark A.
  • Frondel, Manuel
  • Rinne, Sonja

Abstract

Es gibt kaum verlässliche empirische Evidenz zu den regionalen Unterschieden in den Bewertungen der im Zuge der Energiewende ergriffenen energiepolitischen Maßnahmen. Wünschenswert wäre daher eine institutionalisierte, regelmäßige Befragung eines festen Panels von Haushalten zu ihren Einstellungen zur Energie-, Umwelt- und Klimapolitik in Deutschland. In Ermangelung solcher institutionalisierter Erhebungen ist es das Ziel dieses Beitrags, auf Basis einer deutschlandweiten Erhebung aus dem Jahr 2013 unter mehr als 6 500 Haushalten Informationen zu den Einstellungen der Bürger zu unterschiedlichen Energietechnologien und Energieträgern sowie energiepolitischen Maßnahmen wie dem Bau neuer Hochspannungsleitungen zu gewinnen. Die Ergebnisse unserer Analyse zeigen, dass es nicht allein bei der Zustimmung zum Bau neuer Stromtrassen regionale Unterschiede zwischen den Bundesländern gibt. Vielmehr differieren auch die Zustimmung der Befragten zu erneuerbaren Energietechnologien und die Ablehnung der Nutzung von Kohle zur Stromerzeugung regional ganz erheblich.

Suggested Citation

  • Andor, Mark A. & Frondel, Manuel & Rinne, Sonja, 2015. "Wie unbeliebt ist Kohle und wie beliebt sind die Erneuerbaren? Eine empirische Regionalanalyse der energiepolitischen Präferenzen deutscher Haushalte," RWI Materialien 93, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:rwimat:93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/116775/1/834475081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Süsser, Diana & Döring, Martin & Ratter, Beate M.W., 2017. "Harvesting energy: Place and local entrepreneurship in community-based renewable energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 332-341.
    2. Christian Krekel & Julia Rechlitz & Johannes Rode & Alexander Zerrahn, 2020. "Quantifying the externalities of renewable energy plants using wellbeing data: The case of biogas," CEP Discussion Papers dp1738, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Elke D. Groh & Andreas Ziegler, 2017. "On self-interested preferences for burden sharing rules: An econometric analysis for the costs of energy policy measures," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201754, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    4. Groh, Elke D. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2018. "On self-interested preferences for burden sharing rules: An econometric analysis for the costs of energy policy measures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 417-426.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Photovoltaik; Windkraft; Kleinste-Quadrate-Regression; Ordered-Probit-Schätzung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:rwimat:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwiesde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.