IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/153.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bringing power back in: A review of the literature on the role of business in welfare state politics

Author

Listed:
  • Paster, Thomas

Abstract

What is the impact of business interest groups on the formulation of public social policies? This paper reviews the literature in political science, history, and sociology on this question. It identifies two strands: one analyzes the political power and influence of business, the other the preferences and interests of business. Since the 1990s, researchers have shifted their attention from questions of power to questions of preferences. While this shift has produced important insights into the sources of the policy preferences of business, it came with a neglect of issues of power. This paper takes a first step towards re-integrating a power-analytical perspective into the study of the role of business in welfare state politics. It shows how a focus on variation in business power can help to explain both why business interest groups accepted social protection during some periods in the past and why they have become increasingly assertive and averse to social policies since the 1970s.

Suggested Citation

  • Paster, Thomas, 2015. "Bringing power back in: A review of the literature on the role of business in welfare state politics," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/109041/1/821503731.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald F. Bunn, 1959. "The Ideology of the Federation of German Employer's Associations," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 369-369, July.
    2. Strange,Susan, 1996. "The Retreat of the State," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521564298.
    3. Anne Daguerre, 2014. "New corporate elites and the erosion of the Keynesian social compact," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 28(2), pages 323-334, April.
    4. Stephen Bell & Andrew Hindmoor, 2014. "The Structural Power of Business and the Power of Ideas: The Strange Case of the Australian Mining Tax," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 470-486, May.
    5. Bachrach, Peter & Baratz, Morton S., 1962. "Two Faces of Power1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(4), pages 947-952, December.
    6. Israel Marques, 2014. "Firms And Social Policy In The Post-Communist Bloc: Evidence From Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 87/EC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Brian Barry, 2003. "Capitalists Rule. OK? A Commentary on Keith Dowding," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 2(3), pages 323-341, October.
    8. Quinn, Dennis P. & Shapiro, Robert Y., 1991. "Business Political Power: The Case of Taxation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 851-874, September.
    9. Przeworski, Adam & Wallerstein, Michael, 1982. "The Structure of Class Conflict in Democratic Capitalist Societies," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(2), pages 215-238, June.
    10. ANNETTE Van Den BERG & YOLANDA GRIFT & ARJEN Van WITTELOOSTUIJN, 2011. "Managerial Perceptions of Works Councils’ Effectiveness in the Netherlands," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 497-513, July.
    11. Frieden, Jeff, 1988. "Sectoral conflict and foreign economic policy, 1914–1940," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 59-90, January.
    12. Theda Skocpol, 1980. "Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal," Politics & Society, , vol. 10(2), pages 155-201, March.
    13. Brian Barry, 2002. "Capitalists Rule Ok? Some Puzzles About Power," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 1(2), pages 155-184, June.
    14. Reckendrees, Alfred, 2014. "Why did early industrial capitalists suggest minimum wages and social insurance?," MPRA Paper 55520, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Martin Rein & Eskil Wadensjö (ed.), 1997. "Enterprise and the Welfare State," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 802.
    16. Garrett, Geoffrey, 1998. "Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle?," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 787-824, October.
    17. Martin, Cathie Jo & Swank, Duane, 2004. "Does the Organization of Capital Matter? Employers and Active Labor Market Policy at the National and Firm Levels," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(4), pages 593-611, November.
    18. Strange,Susan, 1996. "The Retreat of the State," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521564403.
    19. Berkowitz, Edward & McQuaid, Kim, 1978. "Businessman and Bureaucrat: The Evolution of the American Social Welfare System, 1900–1940," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 120-142, March.
    20. Swank, Duane, 1992. "Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(1), pages 38-54, March.
    21. Patrick Bernhagen & Thomas Bräuninger, 2005. "Structural Power and Public Policy: A Signaling Model of Business Lobbying in Democratic Capitalism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(1), pages 43-64, March.
    22. Mares, Isabela, 1997. "Is Unemployment Insurable? Employers and the Development of Unemployment Insurance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 299-327, September.
    23. Busemeyer, Marius R., 2011. "Varieties of cross-class coalitions in the politics of dualization: Insights from the case of vocational training in Germany," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    24. Stephen Wilks, 2013. "The Political Power of the Business Corporation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14186.
    25. Keith Dowding, 2003. "Resources, Power and Systematic Luck: A Response to Barry," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 2(3), pages 305-322, October.
    26. Höpner, Martin & Waclawczyk, Maximilian, 2012. "Opportunismus oder Ungewissheit? Mitbestimmte Unternehmen zwischen Klassenkampf und Produktionsregime," MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    27. Speth, Rudolf, 2004. "Die politischen Strategien der Initiative neue soziale Marktwirtschaft," Arbeitspapiere 96, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    28. Pepper D. Culpepper & Raphael Reinke, 2014. "Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(4), pages 427-454, December.
    29. Patrick Bernhagen & Thomas Bräuninger, 2005. "Structural Power and Public Policy: A Signaling Model of Business Lobbying in Democratic Capitalism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53, pages 43-64, March.
    30. Svallfors, Stefan, 2015. "Politics as organized combat: New players and new rules of the game in Sweden," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    31. Martin, Cathie Jo, 1995. "Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preference for National Health Reform," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(4), pages 898-913, December.
    32. Ferguson, Thomas, 1984. "From Normalcy to New Deal: industrial structure, party competition, and American public policy in the Great Depression," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 41-94, January.
    33. Wood, Stewart, 1997. "Weakening codetermination? Works council reform in West Germany in the 1980s," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 97-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    34. Vogel, David, 1987. "Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 385-408, October.
    35. Federico Pancaldi, 2011. "Capitalists Against Crisis: Employers and Short Time Work in Germany and Italy, 2008-2010," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 222, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    36. Hassel, Anke & Rehder, Britta, 2001. "Institutional change in the German wage bargaining system: The role of big companies," MPIfG Working Paper 01/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    37. Duvanova,Dinissa, 2013. "Building Business in Post-Communist Russia, Eastern Europe, and Eurasia," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107030169.
    38. Vogel, David, 1983. "The Power of Business in America: A Re-appraisal," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 19-43, January.
    39. Jacob S. Hacker & Paul Pierson, 2002. "Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State," Politics & Society, , vol. 30(2), pages 277-325, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Help or Hindrance? Business and Welfare Policy Formation
      by crowleymarkj in NEP-HIS blog on 2015-05-05 15:03:07

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Paster, 2016. "Adaptation and Influence: The Schumpeterian Perspective on Business-Politics Relations," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 444, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    2. Culpepper Pepper D., 2015. "Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 391-409, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Culpepper Pepper D., 2015. "Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 391-409, October.
    2. Pritish Behuria, 2019. "The comparative political economy of plastic bag bans in East Africa: why implementation has varied in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 372019, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Emmenegger Patrick, 2015. "The long arm of justice: U.S. structural power and international banking," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 473-493, October.
    4. Carl Devos, 1998. "The structural transition of the production system: Regional policy in common understanding," ERSA conference papers ersa98p78, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Hanna Lierse & Laura Seelkopf, 2016. "Room to Manoeuvre? International Financial Markets and the National Tax State," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 145-165, February.
    6. Jiho Jang & Jaechul Lee, 2008. "Citizen Views of Globalization and State Governance in Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 11(2), pages 93-109, September.
    7. Allan McConnell & Paul ’t Hart, 2019. "Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 645-661, December.
    8. Cahan, Steven F., 1996. "Political use of income: Some experimental evidence from Capitol Hill," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 69-87.
    9. Christine Trampusch & Florian Fastenrath, 2021. "States' interests as limits to the power of finance: Regulatory reforms in early local government financialization in the US and UK," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 245-261, April.
    10. Vincent Arel-Bundock & Clint Peinhardt & Amy Pond, 2020. "Political Risk Insurance: A New Firm-level Data Set," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(5), pages 987-1006, May.
    11. Farrell Henry & Newman Abraham L., 2015. "Structuring power: business and authority beyond the nation state," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 527-552, October.
    12. Ainsley Elbra & John Mikler, 2017. "Paying a ‘Fair Share’: Multinational Corporations’ Perspectives on Taxation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 181-190, May.
    13. Cote, Christine, 2018. "A chilling effect? Are international investment agreements hindering government’s regulatory autonomy?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108406, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Natalya Naqvi & Anne Henow & Ha-Joon Chang, 2018. "Kicking away the financial ladder? German development banking under economic globalisation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 672-698, September.
    15. John Gerard Ruggie, 2018. "Multinationals as global institution: Power, authority and relative autonomy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 317-333, September.
    16. José Carlos Marques, 2017. "Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 733-751, July.
    17. Young Kevin, 2015. "Not by structure alone: power, prominence, and agency in American finance," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 443-472, October.
    18. Arts, Bas, 2014. "Assessing forest governance from a ‘Triple G’ perspective: Government, governance, governmentality⁎⁎This article belongs to the Special Issue: Assessing Forest Governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 17-22.
    19. Thanh C. Nguyen & Vítor Castro & Justine Wood, 2022. "Political environment and financial crises," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 417-438, January.
    20. Keyan Lai, 2021. "National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 496-505, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.