IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/jhtire/97.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

STELLA - Stellnetzfischerei-Lösungsansätze: Projekt-Abschlussbericht

Author

Listed:
  • Krumme, Uwe
  • Meyer, Steffi
  • Kratzer, Isabella
  • Chladek, Jerome-Christoph
  • Barz, Fanny
  • Stepputtis, Daniel
  • Strehlow, Harry Vincent
  • Kraak, Sarah B. M.
  • Zimmermann, Christopher

Abstract

Das Projekt STELLA (STELlnetz-Lösungs-Alternativen) zielte darauf ab, Lösungen für die Mitigation unerwünschter Beifänge von Seevögeln und Meeressäugern und damit für den Ausgleich der Konflikte zwischen Naturschutzinteressen und den Interessen der Küstenfischerei in der Ostsee zu finden. Das Projekt wurde vom Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei (OF) von November 2016 bis Januar 2020 aus Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit in Kooperation mit dem Bundesamt für Naturschutz durchgeführt. Von Februar bis Juli 2020 wurden noch ausstehende Arbeiten aus Mitteln des Thünen-Instituts fortgeführt. Die Ziele des Projektes wurden in fünf Arbeitspaketen (AP) bearbeitet: AP1 zielte auf eine verbesserte Erhebung von Aufwands- und Fangdaten aus der Stellnetzfischerei; AP 2 fokussierte auf die technische Verbesserung von Stellnetzen, um unerwünschte Beifänge zu reduzieren; AP3 widmete sich Verbesserungen an zwei Alternativen zum Stellnetz, der Fischfalle und der Hebereuse; das sozialwissenschaftliche AP4 befasste sich mit der fischereilichen Handlungspraxis in Bezug auf die Vermeidung unerwünschter Beifänge. AP5 schließlich bildete aus den Ergebnissen der APs 1 bis 4 die Synthese und leitete Handlungsempfehlungen für die Politik ab. [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Krumme, Uwe & Meyer, Steffi & Kratzer, Isabella & Chladek, Jerome-Christoph & Barz, Fanny & Stepputtis, Daniel & Strehlow, Harry Vincent & Kraak, Sarah B. M. & Zimmermann, Christopher, 2022. "STELLA - Stellnetzfischerei-Lösungsansätze: Projekt-Abschlussbericht," Thünen Reports 97, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtire:97
    DOI: 10.3220/REP1662104969000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/264597/1/1816270393.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3220/REP1662104969000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quynh, Chi Nguyen Thi & Schilizzi, Steven & Hailu, Atakelty & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2018. "Fishers' Preference Heterogeneity and Trade-offs Between Design Options for More Effective Monitoring of Fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 22-33.
    2. R. Quentin Grafton & Ragnar Arnason & Trond Bjorndal & David Campbell & Harry F. Campbell & Colin W. Clark & Robin Connor & Diane P. Dupont & Rognvaldur Hannesson & Ray Hilborn & James E. Kirkley & To, 2005. "Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0508, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    3. Lisa-Britt Fischer & Jens Newig, 2016. "Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Nolde Nielsen, Kåre & Holm, Petter & Aschan, Michaela, 2015. "Results based management in fisheries: Delegating responsibility to resource users," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 442-451.
    5. Verweij, M.C. & van Densen, W.L.T. & Mol, A.J.P., 2010. "The tower of Babel: Different perceptions and controversies on change and status of North Sea fish stocks in multi-stakeholder settings," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 522-533, May.
    6. Gelcich, Stefan & Edwards-Jones, Gareth & Kaiser, Michel J., 2007. "Heterogeneity in fishers' harvesting decisions under a marine territorial user rights policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 246-254, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krumme, Uwe & Meyer, Steffi & Kratzer, Isabella M.F. & Chladek, Jérôme C. & Barz, Fanny & Stepputtis, Daniel & Strehlow, Harry V. & Kraak, Sarah B.M. & Zimmermann, Christopher, 2022. "STELLA - Stellnetzfischerei-Lösungsansätze : Projekt-Abschlussbericht," Thünen Report 324626, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Santiago, Jose L. & Ballesteros, Marta A. & Chapela, Rosa & Silva, Cristina & Nielsen, Kåre N. & Rangel, Mafalda & Erzini, Karim & Wise, Laura & Campos, Aida & Borges, Maria F. & Sala, Antonello & Vir, 2015. "Is Europe ready for a results-based approach to fisheries management? The voice of stakeholders," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 86-97.
    3. Stoeven, Max T. & Quaas, Martin F., 2012. "Privatizing renewable resources: Who gains, who loses?," Economics Working Papers 2012-02, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    4. Lorian-Ovidiu VINTILA & Dan POPESCU & Alina-Nicoleta BIRSAN, 2020. "Digital Transformation As Evolution Of The Organizational Communication Management In The Telecommunications Industry," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 192-199, November.
    5. Kanchanaroek, Yingluk & Termansen, Mette & Quinn, Claire, 2013. "Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 363-373.
    6. Sowman, Merle & Sunde, Jackie & Raemaekers, Serge & Schultz, Oliver, 2014. "Fishing for equality: Policy for poverty alleviation for South Africa's small-scale fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 31-42.
    7. Long Chu & Tom Kompas, 2014. "Targets and Fisheries Management in the Asia and Pacific Region," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 615-622, September.
    8. Mock, Mirijam & Omann, Ines & Polzin, Christine & Spekkink, Wouter & Schuler, Julia & Pandur, Vlad & Brizi, Ambra & Panno, Angelo, 2019. "“Something inside me has been set in motion”: Exploring the psychological wellbeing of people engaged in sustainability initiatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Christopher Costello & Corbett A. Grainger, 2018. "Property Rights, Regulatory Capture, and Exploitation of Natural Resources," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 441-479.
    10. Antero Hirvensalo & Satu Teerikangas & Noelia-Sarah Reynolds & Helka Kalliomäki & Raine Mäntysalo & Hanna Mattila & Kaisa Granqvist, 2021. "Agency in Circular City Ecosystems—A Rationalities Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Hassan Qudrat-Ullah & Mark McCarthy Akrofi & Aymen Kayal, 2020. "Analyzing Actors’ Engagement in Sustainable Energy Planning at the Local Level in Ghana: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Cherunya, Pauline C. & Ahlborg, Helene & Truffer, Bernhard, 2020. "Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: Why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    13. Valeria Superti & Cynthia Houmani & Ralph Hansmann & Ivo Baur & Claudia R. Binder, 2021. "Strategies for a Circular Economy in the Construction and Demolition Sector: Identifying the Factors Affecting the Recommendation of Recycled Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-32, April.
    14. Kuokkanen, A. & Nurmi, A. & Mikkilä, M. & Kuisma, M. & Kahiluoto, H. & Linnanen, L., 2018. "Agency in regime destabilization through the selection environment: The Finnish food system’s sustainability transition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1513-1522.
    15. Naama Teschner & Daniel E. Orenstein, 2022. "A transdisciplinary study of agroecological niches: understanding sustainability transitions in vineyards," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 33-45, March.
    16. Berry, Kevin & Fenichel, Eli P. & Robinson, Brian E., 2019. "The ecological insurance trap," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Konstantinos Karanasios & Paul Parker, 2018. "Explaining the Diffusion of Renewable Electricity Technologies in Canadian Remote Indigenous Communities through the Technological Innovation System Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Tyler D Eddy & Jonathan P A Gardner & Alejandro Pérez-Matus, 2010. "Applying Fishers' Ecological Knowledge to Construct Past and Future Lobster Stocks in the Juan Fernández Archipelago, Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    19. R. Quentin Grafton & Rognvaldur Hannesson & Bruce Shallard & Daryl Sykes & Joe Terry, 2006. "The Economics of Allocation in Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOS)," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0612, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    20. Kivimaa, Paula & Boon, Wouter & Hyysalo, Sampsa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1062-1075.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtire:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vtigvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.