IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkdp/420.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Low-speed recovery in euroland

Author

Listed:
  • Benner, Joachim
  • Gern, Klaus-Jürgen
  • Meier, Carsten-Patrick
  • Scheide, Joachim

Abstract

The economic recovery in the euro area lost momentum in 2004. After a strong increase during the first half, real GDP rose at an annual rate of less than 1 percent in the following two quarters. Overall capacity utilization, which had increased in the first half of 2004 for the first time in several years, fell once again. While internal demand picked up somewhat, the weakening of export growth could not be compensated. In the wake of the renewed weakness, labor market conditions did not improve. Inflation accelerated at the end of last year because of the surge in oil prices. High oil prices and the strength of the euro will dampen the economic expansion for a while, so the recovery will continue to be rather modest during the first half of 2005. Later on, the negative effects will fade, and economic activity will accelerate somewhat. We expect real GDP to increase by 1.4 percent in 2005; the unemployment rate will remain high. Next year, the recovery will gain further momentum also because monetary policy will remain expansionary; we expect that the ECB will not raise key interest rates very soon. Real GDP growth will amount to 2.0 percent in 2006, and the unemployment rate will drop to 8.3 percent. Inflation will remain slightly below 2 percent in both years. The situation of public finances has deteriorated further. In 2004, the aggregated budget deficit rose to 2.9 percent of GDP, compared to 2.7 percent last year. In addition to Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Greece, the deficit ratio probably exceeded the 3 percent margin also in Portugal. Several governments will apparently not consolidate their budgets as intended by the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). In the recently published Stability Programs, the budgets of several large countries are not projected to be balanced until 2008, even though growth assumptions appear very optimistic. In March this year, the European governments and the European Commission decided on changes in the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact. They imply that budget deficits will be higher in the future and that the debt-to-GDP ratios will continue to rise. One reason for this is that countries can now claim special circumstances, which means that a deficit ratio above 3 percent will not automatically be called excessive. Furthermore, countries with high deficits should consolidate their budgets mainly in good times, which are defined as years in which the output gap is positive. And they are given more time than before to take corrective actions. All in all, the sustainability of public finances will deteriorate. The main target of the SGP - to balance the budgets in the medium term and to reduce government debt to below 60 percent of GDP at a satisfactory pace - will not be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Benner, Joachim & Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Meier, Carsten-Patrick & Scheide, Joachim, 2005. "Low-speed recovery in euroland," Kiel Discussion Papers 420, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/3488/1/kd420.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinhas de Souza, Lúcio & Schweickert, Rainer & Movchan, Veronika & Bilan, Olena & Burakovsky, Igor, 2005. "Now so near, and yet still so far: economic relations between Ukraine and the European Union," Kiel Discussion Papers 419, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Peter NUNNENKAMP, 2001. "Why Economic Growth Has Been Weak in Arab Countries: The Role of Exogenous Shocks, Economic Policy Failure and Institutional Defiencies," Middle East and North Africa 330400047, EcoMod.
    3. Schweickert, Rainer & Thiele, Rainer, 2004. "From Washington to post-Washington? Consensus policies and divergent developments in Latin America and Asia," Kiel Discussion Papers 408, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Kamps, Christophe & Meier, Carsten-Patrick & Scheide, Joachim, 2004. "Moderate upswing in Euroland," Kiel Discussion Papers 410, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Hammermann, Felix & Schweickert, Rainer & Vinhas de Souza, Lúcio, 2004. "European monetary integration after EU enlargement," Kiel Discussion Papers 413, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Dohse, Dirk, 2004. "Regionale Verteilung innovativer Aktivitäten in Ostdeutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 411, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schweickert, Rainer, 2005. "Vor der nächsten Erweiterung - Herausforderungen und Reformbedarf der EU," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3667, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hammermann, Felix & Schweickert, Rainer, 2005. "EU enlargement and institutional development: How far away are the EU's Balkan and Black Sea neighbors?," Kiel Working Papers 1261, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Rainer Schweickert & Inna Melnykovska & Ansgar Belke & Ingo Bordon, 2011. "Prospective NATO or EU membership and institutional change in transition countries," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 19(4), pages 667-692, October.
    3. Jürgen Besold & Peter Brandl & Franz Pleschak & Peter Rösler & Heinz Schmalholz & Jens Vogt & Björn Wolf, 2005. "Die Region Oberlausitz-Niederschlesien : Innovationspotenziale und Perspektiven im Dreiländereck," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 38, July.
    4. van Aarle, Bas & de Jong, Eelke & Sosoian, Robert, 2006. "Exchange rate management in Ukraine: Is there a case for more flexibility?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 282-305, October.
    5. Konchyn, Vadym, 2016. "Структурні Виклики В Системі Виробництва Та Зовнішньої Торгівлі Для України: Європейська Інтеграція Чи Її Імітація [Structural Challenges in the System of Production and Foreign Trade for Ukraine: ," MPRA Paper 73798, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Aug 2016.
    6. Thorsten Drautzburg & Andrea Gawrich & Inna Melnykovska, 2008. "Institutional Convergence of CIS Towards European Benchmarks," CASE Network Reports 0082, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    7. Drautzburg, Thorsten & Melnykovska, Inna & Schweickert, Rainer, 2008. "Which membership matters? External vs. internal determinants of institutional change in transition countries," Kiel Working Papers 1421, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2005. "Die Wachstumsschwäche arabischer Länder: wo liegen die Gründe?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3786, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Bakari, Sayef & El Weriemmi, Malek, 2022. "Causality between Domestic Investment and Economic Growth in Arab Countries," MPRA Paper 113079, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Langhammer, Rolf J. & Schweickert, Rainer, 2006. "EU integration and its implications for Asian economies: What we know and what not," Kiel Working Papers 1264, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Belke, Ansgar & Bordon, Ingo G. & Melnykovska, Inna & Schweickert, Rainer, 2009. "Prospective membership and institutional change in transition countries," Kiel Working Papers 1562, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Oldřich Dědek, 2006. "Rizika a výzvy měnové strategie k převzetí eura [Risks and challenges of monetary strategy for euro adoption]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1), pages 3-21.
    13. Vasily Astrov & Zdenek Lukas & Josef Pöschl, 2006. "The Ukrainian Economy between Russia and the Enlarged EU: Consequences for Trade and Investment," wiiw Country Profile 23, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    14. Julija MICHAILOVA, 2009. "Gender, Corruption And Sustainable Growth In Transition Countries," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(3(9)_Fall).
    15. Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Oskamp, Frank & Sander, Birgit & Scheide, Joachim & Meier, Carsten-Patrick & Boss, Alfred & Dovern, Jonas, 2006. "Weltkonjunktur und deutsche Konjunktur im Herbst 2006," Kiel Discussion Papers 430/431, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Boss, Alfred & Christensen, Björn & Schrader, Klaus, 2005. "Anreizprobleme bei Hartz IV: Lieber ALG II statt Arbeit?," Kiel Discussion Papers 421, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    17. Schweickert, Rainer & Šikulová, Ivana, 2004. "Der Weg der Slowakei in die Europäische Union: vom Spätstarter zum Starreformer?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3434, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Looney Robert E, 2005. "Why Has the Middle East Been so Slow to Globalize?," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 2-31, December.
    19. Kristina Kittelmann & Marcel Tirpak & Rainer Schweickert & Lúcio Vinhas De Souza, 2006. "From Transition Crises to Macroeconomic Stability? Lessons from a Crises Early Warning System for Eastern European and CIS Countries," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 48(3), pages 410-434, September.
    20. Vinhas de Souza, Lúcio & Schweickert, Rainer & Movchan, Veronika & Bilan, Olena & Burakovsky, Igor, 2005. "Now so near, and yet still so far: economic relations between Ukraine and the European Union," Kiel Discussion Papers 419, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.