IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwbox/201616.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zum Szenario eines Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs aus der EU (Brexit)

Author

Listed:
  • Gern, Klaus-Jürgen
  • Stolzenburg, Ulrich

Abstract

Der Ausgang ist offen - in doppeltem Sinne, denn mit dem Vertrag von Lissabon besteht erstmals die rechtliche Möglichkeit, aus der EU auszutreten, gleichzeitig ist das Ergebnis des Referendums höchst unsicher. So gibt es derzeit fast täglich neue Meinungsumfragen mit wechselnden, aber stets knappen Mehrheiten für das eine oder andere Lager. Einzelne Ereignisse kurz vor der Abstimmung könnten demnach ausschlaggebend werden, beispielsweise gelungene bzw. misslungene Auftritte bei einer Fernsehdebatte, ein möglicher Terroranschlag oder gar das Abschneiden der englischen Nationalmannschaft bei der Fußballeuropameisterschaft. Aktuelle Wettquoten signalisieren nach wie vor eine höhere Wahrscheinlichkeit für den Verbleib in der EU: Während derzeit (Stand 14. Juni 2016) in diesem Fall für ein Pfund Einsatz 1,66 Pfund zurückgezahlt würden (implizite Wahrscheinlichkeit knapp 60 Prozent), beträgt die Wettquote für den Fall des Brexit 2,4 (40 Prozent).Allerdings haben sich die Quoten in den vergangenen Tagen erheblich angenähert.

Suggested Citation

  • Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Stolzenburg, Ulrich, 2016. "Zum Szenario eines Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs aus der EU (Brexit)," Kiel Insight 2016.16, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwbox:201616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201127/1/ifw-box-2016-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ademmer, Esther, 2016. "Zu den möglichen Auswirkungen eines "Brexit"," Kiel Insight 2016.3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Baker, Jessica & Carreras, Oriol & Kirby, Simon & Meaning, Jack & Piggott, Rebecca, 2016. "Modelling events: The short-term economic impact of leaving the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 339-350.
    3. Monique Ebell & James Warren, 2016. "The Long-Term Economic Impact of Leaving the EU," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 236(1), pages 121-138, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Hauber, Philipp & Kooths, Stefan & Stolzenburg, Ulrich, 2016. "Weltkonjunktur im Herbst 2016 - Weltkonjunktur gewinnt vorerst nur wenig Schwung [World Economy Autumn 2016 - World economic growth to pick up only gradually]," Kieler Konjunkturberichte 21, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Hauber, Philipp, 2016. "Zur Revision der Prognose infolge der Brexit-Entscheidung in Großbritannien," Kiel Insight 2016.18, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens & Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Hauber, Philipp & Kooths, Stefan & Stolzenburg, Ulrich, 2016. "Weltkonjunktur im Sommer 2016 - Wieder etwas stärkere Expansion der Weltwirtschaft [World Economy Summer 2016 - World Economy with somewhat more steam]," Kieler Konjunkturberichte 19, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Baker, Jessica & Carreras, Oriol & Kirby, Simon & Meaning, Jack & Piggott, Rebecca, 2016. "Modelling events: The short-term economic impact of leaving the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 339-350.
    3. Ebell, Monique & Hurst, Ian & Warren, James, 2016. "Modelling the long-run economic impact of leaving the European Union," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 196-209.
    4. Stefan Schiman, 2016. "Weltwirtschaft durch EU-Austritt Großbritanniens kaum beeinträchtigt. Mittelfristige Prognose bis 2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(10), pages 717-727, October.
    5. Adele Bergin & Abian Garcia-Rodriguez & Edgar L. W. Morgenroth & Donal Smith, 2017. "Modelling the Medium- to Long-Term Potential Macroeconomic Impact of Brexit on Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 48(3), pages 305-316.
    6. Patrick Bisciari, 2019. "A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27 economies," Working Paper Research 366, National Bank of Belgium.
    7. Paulo Ferreira & Éder Pereira, 2019. "The impact of the Brexit referendum on British and European Union bank shares: a cross-correlation analysis with national indices," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 335-346.
    8. Khorana, Sangeeta & Narayanan, Badri & Perdikis, Nicholas, 2020. "Modelling the Long Term Potential Macroeconomic Impact of UK leaving the UK: case study on Wales," Conference papers 333236, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Polyzos, Stathis & Samitas, Aristeidis & Katsaiti, Marina-Selini, 2020. "Who is unhappy for Brexit? A machine-learning, agent-based study on financial instability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. László Békési & Zsolt Kovalszky & Tímea Várnai, 2017. "Scenarios for potential macroeconomic impact of Brexit on Hungary," MNB Occasional Papers 2017/125, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).
    11. Begg, Iain, 2017. "Making sense of the costs and benefits of Brexit: challenges for economists," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83587, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Ben Sita, Bernard, 2017. "Volatility patterns of the constituents of FTSE100 in the aftermath of the U.K. Brexit referendum," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 137-146.
    13. Gioele Figus & Katerina Lisenkova & Peter McGregor & Graeme Roy & Kim Swales, 2018. "The long‐term economic implications of Brexit for Scotland: An interregional analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(1), pages 91-115, March.
    14. Mihaela Simionescu, 2017. "The Impact Of Immigrants On The UK Economy," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 9(2), pages 31-46, June.
    15. David Comerford & José V Rodríguez Mora & Beata Javorcik, 2019. "The gains from economic integration," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(98), pages 201-266.
    16. Pitsoulis, Athanassios & Schwuchow, Soeren, 2018. "Though this be madness: A game-theoretic perspective on the Brexit negotiations," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181635, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Broadbent, Ben & Di Pace, Federico & Drechsel, Thomas & Harrison, Richard & Tenreyro, Silvana, 2019. "The Brexit vote, productivity growth and macroeconomic adjustments in the United Kingdom," Discussion Papers 51, Monetary Policy Committee Unit, Bank of England.
    18. Dhingra, Swati & Machin, Stephen & Overman, Henry, 2017. "Local Economic Effects of Brexit," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 242, pages 24-36, November.
    19. Stefan Schiman, 2016. "World Economy Expected to be Hardly Affected by UK's Exit from EU. Medium-term Forecast Until 2021," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 21(17), pages 168-177, December.
    20. Joseph B. Steinberg, 2020. "The macroeconomic impact of NAFTA termination," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 821-865, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwbox:201616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.