Medizinisch-technische Innovationen in der Gesundheitswirtschaft am Beispiel der Neuen Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden (NUB)
Abstract
Medizinisch technische Innovationen in der Gesundheitswirtschaft benötigen Verfahren zur Refinanzierung neuartiger Leistungen. Ein wichtiges Instrument bildet das Verfahren für Neue Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden (NUB). Neben dem möglichen Fortschritt in der Versorgung wird allerdings befürchtet, dass durch entsprechende Innovationen die Kosten stark ansteigen und eine undifferenzierte Verbreitung erfolgt. In den vergangenen Jahren wurden aber nur sehr wenige NUB-Neuanträge anerkannt (Status 1). Auch die Umsetzung neuer Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden in die Versorgungspraxis erfolgt in den meisten Fällen sehr langsam. Neue Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden werden in der Versorgungsrealität überwiegend in spezialisierten Zentren angewendet. Insgesamt trägt das NUB-Verfahren dazu bei, dass Innovationen in einem sehr begrenzten Maß Zugang zur Refinanzierung im Rahmen des G-DGR Systems erhalten. --Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences in its series Forschung Aktuell with number 04/2012.Length:
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:042012
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.iat.eu/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords:This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-04-23 (All new papers)
- NEP-GER-2012-04-23 (German Papers)
References
References listed on IDEASPlease report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Morgan, Steve & Grootendorst, Paul & Lexchin, Joel & Cunningham, Colleen & Greyson, Devon, 2011. "The cost of drug development: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 4-17, April.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:042012For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

