IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/282979.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The implementation of sustainability taxonomies: The case of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Hilbrich, Sören
  • Berensmann, Kathrin
  • Artmann, Giovanna
  • Ashman, Sam
  • Herbold, Theresa
  • Lötters-Viehof, Steffen
  • Monti, Agnese
  • Paffhausen, Felix
  • Roigk, Stephanie
  • Steenkamp, Lee-Ann

Abstract

In recent years, many jurisdictions have developed sustainability taxonomies that aim to increase transparency of financial markets and redirect capital flows to sustainable investments. Such sustainable finance policies can be important levers because today's investments shape economic production processes for decades. This case study on South Africa's Green Finance Taxonomy (GFT) addresses the question of what factors influence the adoption of sustainability taxonomies by potential users. It finds that one year after its publication, the GFT has hardly been used in practice. Important factors hindering an effective implementation are a lack of regulatory embedding, the absence of a legal recognition of the GFT by the European Union (EU), a hesitancy among financial market participants to build capacities to collect the necessary data, and fossil-fuel path dependencies in South Africa's economy. These findings have important policy implications (e.g. regarding accompanying governance measures) for implementation processes in many countries in the coming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilbrich, Sören & Berensmann, Kathrin & Artmann, Giovanna & Ashman, Sam & Herbold, Theresa & Lötters-Viehof, Steffen & Monti, Agnese & Paffhausen, Felix & Roigk, Stephanie & Steenkamp, Lee-Ann, 2023. "The implementation of sustainability taxonomies: The case of South Africa," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:282979
    DOI: 10.23661/idp15.2023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/282979/1/1870674189.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/idp15.2023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Stolowy & Luc Paugam, 2018. "The expansion of non-financial reporting: an exploratory study," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 525-548, July.
    2. Channing Arndt & Rob Davies & Konstantin Makrelov & James Thurlow, 2013. "Measuring the Carbon Intensity of the South African Economy," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 81(3), pages 393-415, September.
    3. Alessi, Lucia & Battiston, Stefano, 2022. "Two sides of the same coin: Green Taxonomy alignment versus transition risk in financial portfolios," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Ionel Bostan & Ionela-Corina Chersan & Magdalena Danileț & Mihaela Ifrim & Viorica Chirilă, 2020. "Investigations Regarding the Linguistic Register Used by Managers to Convey to Stakeholders a Positive View of Their Company, in the Context of the Business Sustainability Desideratum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Alton, Theresa & Arndt, Channing & Davies, Rob & Hartley, Faaiqa & Makrelov, Konstantin & Thurlow, James & Ubogu, Dumebi, 2014. "Introducing carbon taxes in South Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 344-354.
    4. Niccol? Comerio & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2019. "Systematic literature network analysis in accounting: A first application on integrated reporting research," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 73-95.
    5. Andualem Telaye & Pablo Benitez & Seneshaw Tamru & Haileselassie Medhin & Michael Toman, 2019. "Exploring Carbon Pricing in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Reports 31717, The World Bank Group.
    6. Ramiz ur Rehman & Muhammad Zain ul Abidin & Rizwan Ali & Safwan Mohd Nor & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Mudassar Hasan & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad, 2021. "The Integration of Conventional Equity Indices with Environmental, Social, and Governance Indices: Evidence from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Francesco Badia & Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2020. "Quality and Diffusion of Social and Sustainability Reporting in Italian Public Utility Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Mansi Jain & Gagan Deep Sharma & Mrinalini Srivastava, 2019. "Can Sustainable Investment Yield Better Financial Returns: A Comparative Study of ESG Indices and MSCI Indices," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Ricardo Crisostomo, 2022. "Measuring Transition Risk in Investment Funds," Papers 2210.15329, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    10. Rahul Govind Pramani & Sandeep Goel & Rupamanjari Sinha Ray & A. Sarath Babu, 2023. "Corporate governance practices in the mining industry of India: an application of CG index," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 481-498, September.
    11. Dubravka Vlašić & Katarina Poldrugovac, 2022. "Non-Financial Information in Hotel Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Juan Pineiro-Chousa & Noelia Romero-Castro & Marcos Vizcaíno-González, 2019. "Inclusions in and Exclusions from the S&P 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, February.
    13. Martijn Boermans, 2022. "A literature review of securities holdings statistics research and a practitioner’s guide," Working Papers 757, DNB.
    14. Andualem Telaye Mengistu & Pablo Benitez & Seneshaw Tamru & Haileselassie Medhin & Michael Toman, 2019. "Exploring Carbon Pricing in Developing Countries: A Macroeconomic Analysis in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz, 2021. "Identification of Going-Concern Risks in CSR and Integrated Reports of Polish Companies from the Construction and Property Development Sector," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-31, May.
    16. Hammed Afolabi & Ronita Ram & Gunnar Rimmel, 2022. "Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2022. "Greening capital requirements," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37779, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    18. Tommy Gärling & Magnus Jansson, 2021. "Sustainable Investment: Consequences for Psychological Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    19. Hoepner Andreas G. F. & Schneider Fabiola I., 2022. "EU Green Taxonomy Data – A First Vendor Survey," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 221-234, December.
    20. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Windham Eugene Loopesko & Farid Ullah, 2022. "A Model of Risk Information Disclosures in Non-Financial Corporate Reports of Socially Responsible Energy Companies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green finance; sustainable finance; green taxonomy; sustainability taxonomy; South Africa; financial markets; policy implementation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:282979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.