IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/evoice/v19y2022i2p221-234n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Green Taxonomy Data – A First Vendor Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Hoepner Andreas G. F.

    (Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School and UCD Lochlann Quinn School of Business, University College Dublin, Carysfort Avenue, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, Ireland)

  • Schneider Fabiola I.

    (Dublin City University Business School, Collins Avenue, Whitehall, Co. Dublin, Dublin 9, Ireland)

Abstract

This paper aims to explain key concepts of the EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities, a common classification system established to clarify which investments are environmentally sustainable. Additionally, it provides insight on the compliance of corporate activities with the EU Taxonomy’s criteria based on a first survey on market data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoepner Andreas G. F. & Schneider Fabiola I., 2022. "EU Green Taxonomy Data – A First Vendor Survey," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 221-234, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:221-234:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/ev-2022-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0022
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ev-2022-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    2. Alessi, Lucia & Battiston, Stefano, 2022. "Two sides of the same coin: Green Taxonomy alignment versus transition risk in financial portfolios," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Ottmar Edenhofer & Christian Klein & Kai Lessmann & Marco Wilkens, 2022. "Financing the transformation: a proposal for a credit scheme to finance the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 788-797, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Martijn Boermans & Rients Galema, 2023. "Carbon home bias of European investors," Working Papers 786, DNB.
    3. Essossinam Beguedou & Satyanarayana Narra & Ekua Afrakoma Armoo & Komi Agboka & Mani Kongnine Damgou, 2023. "Alternative Fuels Substitution in Cement Industries for Improved Energy Efficiency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Helena Redondo & Elisa Aracil, 2024. "Climate‐related credit risk: Rethinking the credit risk framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S1), pages 21-33, March.
    5. Hilbrich, Sören & Berensmann, Kathrin & Artmann, Giovanna & Ashman, Sam & Herbold, Theresa & Lötters-Viehof, Steffen & Monti, Agnese & Paffhausen, Felix & Roigk, Stephanie & Steenkamp, Lee-Ann, 2023. "The implementation of sustainability taxonomies: The case of South Africa," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho, 2023. "Bibliometric Review and Technical Summary of PWR Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Ricardo Crisostomo, 2022. "Measuring Transition Risk in Investment Funds," Papers 2210.15329, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    8. Martijn Boermans, 2022. "A literature review of securities holdings statistics research and a practitioner’s guide," Working Papers 757, DNB.
    9. Huang, Jun & Han, Feifei & Li, Yun, 2023. "Government as major customer: The effects of government procurement on corporate environmental, social, and governance performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Passas & Alexandros Garefalakis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos, 2022. "The Determinants of the Environmental Performance of EU Financial Institutions: An Empirical Study with a GLM Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2022. "Greening capital requirements," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37779, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    12. Andre Höck & Tobias Bauckloh & Maurice Dumrose & Christian Klein, 2023. "ESG criteria and the credit risk of corporate bond portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 572-580, December.
    13. Höck, André & Bauckloh, Michael Tobias & Dumrose, Maurice & Klein, Christian, 2023. "ESG criteria and the credit risk of corporate bond portfolios," CFR Working Papers 23-03, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    14. Aloui, Donia & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Guesmi, Khaled & Vigne, Samuel, 2023. "The European Central Bank and green finance: How would the green quantitative easing affect the investors' behavior during times of crisis?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Donia Aloui & Brahim Gaies & Rafla Hchaichi, 2023. "Exploring environmental degradation spillovers in Sub-Saharan Africa: the energy–financial instability nexus," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1699-1724, June.
    16. Suzana Ostojic & Lorenzo Simone & Mark Edler & Marzia Traverso, 2024. "How Practically Applicable Are the EU Taxonomy Criteria for Corporates?—An Analysis for the Electrical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU green taxonomy; responsible investment; ESG; European commission platform on sustainable finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:221-234:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.