IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cuswps/64.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die narrative Krise der (Wirtschafts-)Wissenschaft und ihre Bedeutung in der globalen Umweltpolitik

Author

Listed:
  • Heller, Hannah

Abstract

(Wirtschafts-)wissenschaftliches Wissen wird durch narratives Wissen legitimiert. In der Moderne haben sich jedoch monetäre Vergesellschaftungs- und Denkformen herausgebildet, mit denen ein antagonistisches Mensch-Natur-Verhältnis einhergeht. Als Metanarrative sind sie in gesellschaftlichen Bereichen wie Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Politik wirksam. Anhand philosophischer und kulturgeschichtlicher Arbeiten werden diese Metanarrative als "kaufmännisch", "mechanistisch" und "marktfundamental" charakterisiert und anschließend ihre Bedeutung in der globalen Umweltpolitik diskutiert. Für die Überwindung der gegenwärtigen ökologischen Vielfachkrise braucht es andere Metanarrative, denen demokratische Vergesellschaftungs- und Denkformen zugrunde liegen. Diese werden abschließend skizziert.

Suggested Citation

  • Heller, Hannah, 2020. "Die narrative Krise der (Wirtschafts-)Wissenschaft und ihre Bedeutung in der globalen Umweltpolitik," Working Paper Series 64, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227492/1/1742059201.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkatachalam, L., 2007. "Environmental economics and ecological economics: Where they can converge?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 550-558, March.
    2. Kathleen McAfee, 2012. "Nature in the Market-World: Ecosystem services and inequality," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 55(1), pages 25-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateo Cordier & José Pérez Agúndez & Walter Hecq & Bertrand Hamaide, 2013. "A guiding framework for ecosystem services monetization in ecological-economic modeling," Working Papers CEB 13-018, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Bartus, Gábor, 2008. "Van-e a gazdasági tevékenységeknek termodinamikai korlátja? [Is there a thermodynamic constraint on economic activity?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1010-1022.
    3. Balvanera, Patricia & Pérez-Harguindeguy, Natalia & Perevochtchikova, María & Laterra, Pedro & Cáceres, Daniel M. & Langle-Flores, Alfonso, 2020. "Ecosystem services research in Latin America 2.0: Expanding collaboration across countries, disciplines, and sectors," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    4. Bajmócy, Zoltán & Málovics, György, 2009. "A fenntarthatóság közgazdaságtani értelmezései [Economic interpretations of sustainability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 464-483.
    5. Antoine Missemer, 2012. "William Stanley Jevons' The Coal Question (1865), beyond the rebound effect," Post-Print halshs-00738258, HAL.
    6. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    7. Sagvosdkin, Valentin, 2021. "Qualifiziert für die Zukunft? Zur Pluralität der wirtschaftsjournalistischen Ausbildung in Deutschland," Working Paper Series 69, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    8. Missemer, Antoine, 2012. "William Stanley Jevons' The Coal Question (1865), beyond the rebound effect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 97-103.
    9. GÖNCZI József, 2020. "Approaches To The Concept Of Sustainability In Ecological And Environmental Economy," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 74-85, December.
    10. Matthews, Yvonne, 2023. "A hybrid and hierarchical stated preference study of freshwater restoration in Aotearoa New Zealand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Leire Barañano & Naroa Garbisu & Itziar Alkorta & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Jean Christophe Graz & Michel Damian & Mehdi Abbas, 2007. "Towards an evolutionary environmental regulation of capitalism : sustainable development 20 years after," Post-Print halshs-00369962, HAL.
    13. Dani Broitman, 2020. "The Game of Developers and Planners: Ecosystem Services as a (Hidden) Regulation through Planning Delay Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Balint Horvath & Miriam Bahna & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "The Ecological Criteria of Circular Growth and the Rebound Risk of Closed Loops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Belsky, Jill M., 2015. "Community forestry engagement with market forces: A comparative perspective from Bhutan and Montana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 29-36.
    16. Castro e Silva, Manuela & Teixeira, Aurora A.C., 2011. "A bibliometric account of the evolution of EE in the last two decades: Is ecological economics (becoming) a post-normal science?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 849-862, March.
    17. Smessaert, Jacob & Missemer, Antoine & Levrel, Harold, 2020. "The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Antonella Pietta & Marco Tononi, 2021. "Re-Naturing the City: Linking Urban Political Ecology and Cultural Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Heller, Hannah & Sagvosdkin, Valentin, 2020. "Ideologie und Erzählung: Die Bedeutung des marktfundamentalen Metanarrativs in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften," Working Paper Series 60, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    20. Wicker, Pamela & Becken, Susanne, 2013. "Conscientious vs. ambivalent consumers: Do concerns about energy availability and climate change influence consumer behaviour?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 41-48.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ökonomisches Denken; Narrative; Narrative Ökonomik; Pluralismus; Wirtschaftswissenschaft; Marktfundamentalismus; globale Umweltpolitik; ökologische Ökonomik; transformative Wissenschaft;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • N10 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cusanus-hochschule.de/forschung/institut-fuer-oekonomie/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.