IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa05p19.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Matrix Land Use Analysis - a Case Study of Landscape Changes in Israeli Carmel Area

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Sonis
  • Maxim Shoshany
  • Naftali Goldschlager

Abstract

The spatial redistribution of the land uses can be measured by remote sensing conventional methods in the form of the matrices of the land uses redistributions within a given set of regions in a given time period. Two new methods of analysis of such land uses redistribution matrices are proposed. The first method represent the geometric and analytical algorithm of decomposition of the land use redistribution matrix into the convex combination of the land use matrices which represents the main tendencies of land use redistributions in a given set of regions in a given time period. Thus, each empirically given land use redistribution can be presented as a superposition of the land uses redistributions connected with the optimal solutions of some extreme land use redistributions corresponding to the parsimonious behavior of land users in a given set of regions in a given time period. The second method represents the construction of the artificial land use landscape corresponding to the minimum information land use redistribution with fixed initial and final land use distributions. The comparison of the empirical land uses landscape with the artificial oner can be acheived by measurement of the entropy limitator of homogenuity of land uses redistribution. This limitator represents the spatial specifics of an actual land use redistributions connected with different parsimonious behavior of the land users themselves. As an empirical validation of these new methods the set of 10 different regions in the vicinity of Haifa Carmel area is chosen for different time intervals and the main tendencies of land use redistributions are identified together with their minimum information artificial landscapes. The new methodology and modeling approach will assist future planning in the rural-urban fringe. Optimal solutions for nature conservation and urban development conflicts can be learned through the application of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Sonis & Maxim Shoshany & Naftali Goldschlager, 2005. "Matrix Land Use Analysis - a Case Study of Landscape Changes in Israeli Carmel Area," ERSA conference papers ersa05p19, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa05/papers/19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Sonis & J. D. Hewings & Jiemin Guo, 2000. "A New Image of Classical Key Sector Analysis: Minimum Information Decomposition of the Leontief Inverse," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 401-423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Carmen Lima & M. Alejandro Cardenete & José Vallés, 2003. "Un análisis estructural de la economía andaluza a través de matrices de contabilidad social: 1990-19991," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2003/20, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    2. Marco Percoco, 2006. "A Note on the Inoperability Input‐Output Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 589-594, June.
    3. Oosterhaven, Jan, 2004. "On the definition of key sectors and the stability of net versus gross multipliers," Research Report 04C01, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    4. Rumiana Gorska, 2015. "Backward and forward linkages based on an input-output analysis – comparative study of Poland and selected European countries," Applied Econometrics Papers, Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 30-50.
    5. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    6. Olczyk, Magdalena, 2011. "Structural changes in the Polish economy - the analysis of input-output," MPRA Paper 33659, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marco Percoco, 2011. "On the Local Sensitivity Analysis of the Inoperability Input‐Output Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1038-1042, July.
    8. Matías Piaggio & Vicent Alcántara Escolano & Emilio Padilla, 2012. "Economic structure and key sectors analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguay," Working Papers wpdea1204, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    9. Chokri Dridi & Geoffrey Hewings, 2002. "An Investigation of Industry Associations, Association Loops and Economic Complexity: Application to Canada and the United States," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 275-296.
    10. Florent MCISAAC & Florent Mc ISAAC, 2017. "An Input-Output Analysis: What Would a Low-Carbon Economy for Brazil Mean?," Working Paper f2f77b78-bd3b-4408-b3e9-d, Agence française de développement.
    11. Zhining Hu & Jianghuai Zheng & Jialing Wang, 2011. "Impact of Industrial Linkages on Firm Performance in Development Zones," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 78-105, March.
    12. Thijs Raa, 2020. "Linkages, fields of influence and key sectors," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-3, December.
    13. Malcolm Beynon & Max Munday, 2008. "Stochastic key sector analysis: an application to a regional input–output framework," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(4), pages 863-877, December.
    14. García Muñiz, Ana Salomé, 2013. "Input–output research in structural equivalence: Extracting paths and similarities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 796-803.
    15. repec:rri:wpaper:200605 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Sari, Dyah Wulan & Restikasari, Wenny & Ajija, Shochrul Rohmatul & Tarbiyah Islamia, Haura Azzara & Muchtar, Darmawati, 2021. "The Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment and Export Expansion on the Performance of the High-Tech Manufacturing Industry," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 55(2), pages 91-105.
    17. Malcolm Beynon & Calvin Jones & Max Munday, 2009. "The Embeddedness of Tourism-related Activity: A Regional Analysis of Sectoral Linkages," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2123-2141, September.
    18. Lima , M.Carmen & Cardenete, M.Alejandro & Hewings , G.J.D. & Vallés Ferrer, José, 2004. "A structural analysis of a regional economy using Social Accounting Matrices:1990-1999," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 5, pages 113-138.
    19. Vito Albino & Erik Dietzenbacher & Silvana Kuhtz, 2003. "Analysing Materials and Energy Flows in an Industrial District using an Enterprise Input-Output Model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 457-480.
    20. B. Andreosso‐O'Callaghan & G. Yue, 2004. "Intersectoral Linkages and Key Sectors in China, 1987–1997," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 165-183, June.
    21. Yongfei Li & Sang-Gun Lee & Myungjai Kong, 2019. "The industrial impact and competitive advantage of China’s ICT industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(1), pages 101-127, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.