Innovation and Employment Growth in Industrial Clusters: Evidence from Aeronautical Firms in Germany
AbstractIn recent years we can observe a surge of interest among academics as well as regional policy makers in the phenomenon of geographical clustering of high-technology firms. In this study, we investigate whether agglomeration forces do have an impact on the innovative performance of a collection of spatially concentrated aeronautic firms in Northern Germany which is claimed to be the third largest aeronautic ?Standort?. This alleged cluster comprises a group of co-located aeronautic (supplying) firms. We analyze three forces, namely knowledge flows, demanding customers and rivalry that may have a direct impact on the innovative performance of firms. Specifically, this paper sets out to investigate three interrelated questions. 1) What agglomeration forces are relevant as measured by a significant impact on the innovative performance of firms? 2) Do firms in clusters benefit from spatially proximate inter-firm linkages, that may generate agglomerative advantages, more strongly than from distant linkages? 3) Are these forces operating exclusively in clusters, while such effects are not relevant for spatially dispersed firms? We make use of own survey data of 111 firms within and 68 outside the supposed cluster grouped around the cities of Hamburg and Bremen. A survey has been specifically designed to collect data on firms' innovation activities as well as a set of indicators for the agglomeration forces which may be operating in clusters. The latter consist of the perceived importance (6-point scale) of the various spatially inter-firm linkages that may generate agglomeration advantages. The questions are systematically asked for linkages in proximity as well as for linkages to distant firms and institutions. The basic idea underlying this concept is that it is the firms themselves that can best evaluate the relevance of such forces. The firms outside the cluster form a control group so that the effects of clustering can be identified by looking at the differences between the two groups. We have estimated a probit model of whether the firms have introduced product (process) innovations or not. The estimations provide the following results: First, for the group of cluster firms we have found that linkages to geographic proximate firms and institutions do have an impact on product innovations (process innovations are not affected). Firms that rate knowledge flows from proximate scientific institutions (e.g. universities) and proximate public information sources (e.g. trade shows) as more important are more likely to introduce product innovations. Moreover, motivational effects that stem from local rivalry have a negative effect whereas demanding customers have a positive impact on innovative performance. Second, geography seems to be relevant because only proximate firms and institutions do have a statistically significant impact. The estimated coefficients of the variables that reflect knowledge flows and motivational effects that stem from distant firms and institutions are statistically insignificant. Third, differences between the cluster and the control group exist. While demanding customers in geographical proximity do have a positive impact on innovative performance of cluster firms this effect is statistically insignificant for the firms of the control group.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa03p284.
Date of creation: Aug 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Augasse 2-6, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Web page: http://www.ersa.org
Other versions of this item:
- Werner Bonte, 2004. "Innovation and employment growth in industrial clusters: evidence from aeronautical firms in Germany," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 259-278.
- JEL - Labor and Demographic Economics - - - - -
- Cla - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - - - -
- L62 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2004-02-29 (All new papers)
- NEP-GEO-2004-02-29 (Economic Geography)
- NEP-INO-2004-02-29 (Innovation)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jaffe, A.B. & Trajtenberg, M., 1992.
"Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,"
14-92, Tel Aviv.
- Jaffe, Adam B & Trajtenberg, Manuel & Henderson, Rebecca, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 577-98, August.
- Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1992. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," NBER Working Papers 3993, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Oerlemans, Leon A.G. & Meeus, Marius T.H., 2002. "Spatial embeddedness and firm performance: an empirical exploration of the effects of proximity on innovative and economic performance," ERSA conference papers ersa02p054, European Regional Science Association.
- Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1996.
"Economics of Agglomeration,"
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,
Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 339-378, December.
- Fujita,Masahisa & Thisse,Jacques-Francois, 2002. "Economics of Agglomeration," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521801386, October.
- Fujita,Masahisa & Thisse,Jacques-Francois, 2002. "Economics of Agglomeration," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521805247, October.
- Baptista, Rui & Swann, Peter, 1998. "Do firms in clusters innovate more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 525-540, September.
- Griliches, Zvi, 1990.
"Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,"
Journal of Economic Literature,
American Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 1661-1707, December.
- Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 287-343 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Zvi Griliches, 1991. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," NBER Working Papers 3301, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- repec:fth:harver:1473 is not listed on IDEAS
- Catherine Beaudry, 2001. "Entry, Growth and Patenting in Industrial Clusters: A Study of the Aerospace Industry in the UK," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 405-436.
- Swann, Peter & Prevezer, Martha, 1996. "A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1139-1157, October.
- Verspagen, Bart & Loo, Ivo de, 1999. "Technology Spillovers between Sectors and over Time," Open Access publications from Maastricht University urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-18000, Maastricht University.
- Thomas Brenner & AndrÃ© MÃ¼hlig, 2007. "Factors and Mechanisms Causing the Emergence of Local Industrial Clusters - A Meta-Study of 159 Cases," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2007-23, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group.
- Richard Harris, 2011.
"Models Of Regional Growth: Past, Present And Future,"
Journal of Economic Surveys,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 913-951, December.
- Richard Harris, 2008. "Models of Regional Growth: Past, Present and Future," SERC Discussion Papers 0002, Spatial Economics Research Centre, LSE.
- Fu, Xiaolan & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Soete, Luc, 2011.
"The Role of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Innovation in the Emerging Economies: Technological Change and Catching-up,"
Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1204-1212, July.
- Xiaolan Fu & Carlo Pietrobelli & Luc Soete, 2010. "The Role of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Innovation in the Emerging Economies: Technological Change and Catching Up," IDB Publications 12078, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Doran, Justin & Jordan, Declan, 2012. "Cross Sectoral Differences in Drivers of Innovation," MPRA Paper 44470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Thomas Brenner & Andreas Gildner, 2006. "Long-term Implications of Local Industrial Clusters," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006-08, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group.
- David Smith & Gamal Ibrahim, 2006. "Cluster Dynamics: Corporate Strategy, Industry Evolution and Technology Trajectories -- A Case Study of the East Midlands Aerospace Cluster," Local Economy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 362-377, November.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.