This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Strategic Creditor Passivity, Regulation, and Bank Bailouts

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Janet Mitchell
Abstract

This paper analyzes two interrelated aspects of banking crises: the choices that banks make between actively pursuing satisfaction of their claims in default versus passively rolling over loans; and choices by regulators to "punish" passive and insolvent banks versus rescuing them. Because a bank's actions may signal its poor financial condition or because a bank may wish to gamble for resurrection, a bank with financial problems may choose to passively roll over its bad loans rather than to initiate bankruptcy against a defaulter. Regulators can play a crucial role in preventing creditor passivity, through their ex ante choice of monitoring capability and through their ex post choice of policy for insolvent or passive banks. Increasing the degree of monitoring, together with the threat of ex post punishment for passive behavior, can lower the level of passivity. Yet, if too many banks are discovered to be passive or insolvent, a situation labeled "too many-to-fail" (TMTF) may arise, whereby it is less costly to rescue banks than to close large numbers of banks or to fire the bank managers. Banks may implicitly collude through their choice of actions in order to trigger TMTF. One result of the analysis is that attempts by the regulator to offer rescue in order to induce insolvent banks to use bankruptcy against their defaulters and to reveal their insolvency may fail if ex ante monitoring capability is too weak or if the recapitalization accompanying rescue is not sufficiently generous. Rescue and recapitalization may thus need to be repeated in the future. Another principal result is that the regulator may react to the possibility of banks' triggering TNTFF by "softening," either ex ante by lowering monitoring capacity or, ex post by rescuing insolvent and passive banks. The threat of TMTF may thus make it impossible for the regulator to implement tough banking regulation.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp46.pdf
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School in its series William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series with number 46.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: pages
Date of creation: 01 May 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wdi:papers:1997-46

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 724 E. University Ave. Wyly Hall, Floor 1, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
Phone: 734 615 4566
Fax: (734) 763-5850
Email:
Web page: http://www.wdi.umich.edu
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Patricia Loh).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Malyutina Marina & Parilova Svetlana, 2003. "Bank failures in Russia: why do banks go bankrupt?," EERC Working Paper Series 00-073e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? LogEc provides statistical analysis about downloads from this service (and others).

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.