EU Bananarama III
AbstractOn July 1, 1993 the European Union (EU) adopted a unified banana policy that is even more distortionary and costly than some of the disparate national policies it replaced. Before, some EU countries gave preferred market access and high prices to banana producers from selected developing countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Pacific, and from EU territorial suppliers. This preferential status was regarded as a form of aid to countries with historical ties to certain EU countries (France, Great Britain, Italy, Portugal, and Spain). Other EU countries (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands) granted no preferences and either had free trade policies or imposed only low tariffs. The earlier quota-based national policies were inefficient because the main benefits of the quotas and high prices were enjoyed by importers, wholesalers, and retailers in the quota-restricted countries. Under the unified EU policy, quotas, high prices, and preferential access provide aid to preferred suppliers, but cost EU consumers dearly and the quota restrictions hurt nonpreferred suppliers (mainly Latin American countries). But the main problem with the new policy is that it extends protection (and consequent inefficiencies) to countries where it didn't exist before. As the costs of the new EU policy become better understood, new forces are emerging that will probably create pressure for change over the next decade. Banana producers who now receive aid through preferential access to the EU banana market are likely to lose those preferences. This could deal a hefty blow to several small Caribbean island economies and some African countries. But much more efficient alternative mechanisms exist through which the European Union could grant aid to these economies. The European Union and the favored Caribbean countries could all gain much by shifting from banana aid to formalized, targeted general development aid.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1386.
Date of creation: 31 Dec 1994
Date of revision:
Environmental Economics&Policies; Gender and Law; Markets and Market Access; Access to Markets; Gender and Law;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Guyomard, Herve & Laroche, Catherine & Mouel, Chantal Le, 1999.
"An economic assessment of the Common Market Organization for bananas in the European Union,"
Agricultural Economics: The Journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists,
International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 20(2), March.
- Guyomard, Herve & Laroche, Catherine & Le Mouel, Chantal, 1999. "An economic assessment of the Common Market Organization for bananas in the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 105-120, March.
- Chantai Le Mouël & Catherine Laroche & Nadine Herrard & Hervé Guyomard, 1997. "L'Organisation commune de marché dans l'Union européenne : impact de la taille du contingent tarifaire appliqué aux bananes dollar et non traditionnelles ACP," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 127(1), pages 15-32.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.