Economic policy reform, government debt guarantees, and financial bailouts
AbstractEconomic policy reform that creates opportunities for new productive activities often shifts wealth from one set of agents toward another, creating reason for political pressure against the reform. The author explores how government financial guarantees secure the political support of the reform's"losers."Governnment guarantees have two effects: 1) they will probably lead to a bailout of some firms'obligations to debtholders. This bailout must be financed by taxes on the cash flows from old and new projects, and tax collection involves a resource cost; 2) the existence of the guarantees distorts entrepreneurs'investment incentives by creating an incentive to invest in overly risky projects and not to invest in safe new projects. The author demonstrates that government guarantees on existing debt, combined with the use of junior secured debt to finance new projects, would mitigate the problem of underinvestment in safe projects and overinvestment in risky projects. The potentially positive role of government financial guarantees after economic reform does not imply that prudential banking standards fail to apply during a period of economic reform. If anything, prudential standards are more important during such a period. But it does imply that a financial bailout may be a lagging indicator of a successful policy to offer financial guarantees to potential losers, so they will support reform.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1369.
Date of creation: 31 Oct 1994
Date of revision:
Banks&Banking Reform; Financial Intermediation; Environmental Economics&Policies; Economic Theory&Research; Public Sector Economics&Finance;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Stulz, ReneM. & Johnson, Herb, 1985. "An analysis of secured debt," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 501-521, December.
- Smith, Clifford Jr. & Warner, Jerold B., 1979. "On financial contracting : An analysis of bond covenants," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 117-161, June.
- Fernandez, Raquel & Rodrik, Dani, 1991. "Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 81(5), pages 1146-55, December.
- Jacklin, Charles J & Bhattacharya, Sudipto, 1988. "Distinguishing Panics and Information-Based Bank Runs: Welfare and Policy Implications," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(3), pages 568-92, June.
- Douglas W. Diamond & Philip H. Dybvig, 2000.
"Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity,"
Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Win, pages 14-23.
- Diamond, Douglas W & Dybvig, Philip H, 1983. "Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(3), pages 401-19, June.
- Bernanke, Ben & Gertler, Mark, 1989. "Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 79(1), pages 14-31, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.